Re: indirect JFS mount

Bob.Kelley_at_BRINKSINC.COM
Date: 12/18/03

  • Next message: John Jolet: "Re: aix 5.2 and httpd question" 
    Date:         Thu, 18 Dec 2003 11:14:10 -0600
To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU

    can you give a clearer description of what the problem is you are
    encountering with the backups?

    Bobby Kelley Jr.
    972-877-5341

    |---------+---------------------------->
    | | Marcelino Mata |
    | | <mmata@MULTIMATIC|
    | | .COM> |
    | | Sent by: IBM AIX |
    | | Discussion List |
    | | <aix-l@Princeton.|
    | | EDU> |
    | | |
    | | |
    | | 12/18/2003 10:55 |
    | | AM |
    | | Please respond to|
    | | IBM AIX |
    | | Discussion List |
    | | |
    |---------+---------------------------->
    >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
      | |
      | To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU |
      | cc: |
      | Subject: indirect JFS mount |
    >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

    We use Netbackup to backup our AIX server and we are encountering problems
    which Veritas says can be fixed by us changing our JFS mount option to
    "multiple indirect addressing". Using a command like this "chfs -a
    options=rw,mind /fsname".

    I am concerned about any negative aspects of changing the default mount
    options on a production server. I have a very low confidence level with
    Veritas's knowledge of AIX filesystems. Has anyone else made changes to
    their systems and can they comment on the pro's and cons' of indirect mount
    options?

    Marcelino

    NOTICE TO BRINK'S EMPLOYEES:
    All electronic mail communications composed, sent, received or stored on or
    through Brink's equipment are subject to the Brink's Electronic
    Communications Policy. Employees should have no expectation of privacy in
    their use of the Company's electronic mail system.

  • Next message: John Jolet: "Re: aix 5.2 and httpd question"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Running 64 bit on P655
      ... only job was to be NFS servers of 6 TByte of data on EMC Clariion attached ... NOTICE TO BRINK'S EMPLOYEES: ... All electronic mail communications composed, sent, received or stored on or ... their use of the Company's electronic mail system. ...
      (AIX-L)
    • Re: Cloning an AIX 4.3.3 machine
      ... > the 44p is chrp architecture? ... NOTICE TO BRINK'S EMPLOYEES: ... All electronic mail communications composed, sent, received or stored on or ... their use of the Company's electronic mail system. ...
      (AIX-L)
    • Re: oldest file in a filesystem
      ... The cache is about 35GB in size and the average file size ... NOTICE TO BRINK'S EMPLOYEES: ... All electronic mail communications composed, sent, received or stored on or ... their use of the Company's electronic mail system. ...
      (AIX-L)
    • Re: indirect JFS mount
      ... are you using GPFS by chance and not JFS? ... I am concerned about any negative aspects of changing the default mount ... All electronic mail communications composed, sent, received or stored on or ... their use of the Company's electronic mail system. ...
      (AIX-L)
    • Re: need JDK/JRE 1.3.1 or greater
      ... NOTICE TO BRINK'S EMPLOYEES: ... All electronic mail communications composed, sent, received or stored on or ... their use of the Company's electronic mail system. ...
      (AIX-L)