Re: Admins to Boxes ratio

From: John Jolet (john.jolet_at_FXFN.COM)
Date: 02/27/04

  • Next message: Holger.VanKoll_at_SWISSCOM.COM: "Re: Ulimit clarification"
    Date:         Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:20:41 -0600
    To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
    
    

    Unfortunately, we run a 24x7 environment, so this ratio is way too
    high. It's okay for just keeping the balls in the air, but no one has
    time to go back and do performance tuning, capacity planning,
    configuration issues, etc. Ideally, you want your admins to have some
    free bandwidth for "improvement", not just running full time
    homeostasis. It also sucks when someone goes on two-weeks vacation....

    Gosselin, Mark wrote:

    >I have about 125 boxes (mix of Solaris, AIX, HP, and Red Hat), and I'm all alone. Make sure you definitely don't tell your boss that
    >one. Previously, I worked for a company that had a "standard" for this. Their thought was 60-75 boxes per admin, which is
    >exactly what John Jolet's ratio is... I feel a little bit overworked (especially because I also do some development work), but my
    >environment is pretty stable, so another person would likely be kind of bored.
    >I do get a college student "intern" in the summer and during winter semester break, so I do get some time to do things that pile up.
    >I'm trying to convince my boss that we need someone else at least part time....
    >
    >
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Patrick B. O'Brien [mailto:pobrien@DOIT.NV.GOV]
    > Sent: Thu 2/26/2004 6:43 PM
    > To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
    > Cc:
    > Subject: Admins to Boxes ratio
    >
    >
    >
    > Anybody have any IBM Documentation defining the AIX Admins to Boxes ratio?
    >
    > I'm an AIX Admin supporting some 14 AIX Boxes and a few RH Boxes; I think I could use some help. My boss wants to see if IBM agrees.
    >
    > Thank you.
    >
    >
    >


  • Next message: Holger.VanKoll_at_SWISSCOM.COM: "Re: Ulimit clarification"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns
      ... >Xcott Craver wrote: ... >> Okay, done, now what's step two? ... >That is somewhat dependent on the environment, ...
      (sci.crypt)
    • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns
      ... >Xcott Craver wrote: ... >> Okay, done, now what's step two? ... >That is somewhat dependent on the environment, ...
      (comp.security.unix)
    • (greedy) Awesomuntu?
      ... but went ahead cuz wanted to apt-get yatm and awesome ... the CUI-promt music creating environment setup went okay ...
      (Ubuntu)
    • Re: Clark Foam Out Of Business
      ... > I wonder what other toys are out there that are nasty to the ... Okay. ...
      (rec.windsurfing)
    • Re: Recharging A/C on 1999 Dodge Caravan
      ... >>I tried Recharging the A/C on my girlfriends 1999 Dodge Caravan Sport ... >> my end result It blows nothing but hot air. ... > environment it probably isn't the best idea to admit to a federal ...
      (rec.autos.makers.chrysler)