Re: JFS2 - good or bad?
From: Bill Verzal (BVerzal_at_KOMATSUNA.COM)
Date: 07/12/04
- Previous message: Jan-Frode Myklebust: "Re: SSA error message what it mean?"
- In reply to: Green, Simon: "Re: JFS2 - good or bad?"
- Next in thread: John Jolet: "Re: JFS2 - good or bad?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 11:04:15 -0500 To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
I do play with nbpi on my filesystems. I have some at 32k.
BV
--------------------------------------------------------
There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand
binary, and those who don't ...
Bill Verzal
Project Leader, Komatsu America
(847) 970-3726 - direct
(847) 970-4184 - fax
"Green, Simon"
<Simon.Green@EU.A
LTRIA.COM> To
Sent by: IBM AIX aix-l@Princeton.EDU
Discussion List cc
<aix-l@Princeton.
EDU> Subject
Re: JFS2 - good or bad?
07/12/2004 10:46
AM
Please respond to
IBM AIX
Discussion List
<aix-l@Princeton.
EDU>
You can get the same effect by specifying a higher nbpi. We usually use
16384, which gives you 1% used on an empty filesystem, so I don't see that
as a major advantage, although I'll concede it's a better solution in
theory. For filesystems where the number of inodes used is very high, I
can
see that JFS2 would be useful. (I've had a couple of systems where /var
has
become unusable because %inode used reached 100%, whilst the actual space
was scarcely 50% used.)
INLINE jfs2 logs I can see as being interesting: removes a point of
contention. However, does it not increase disk head movement? On some
systems, I've got multiple jfslogs specifically allocated on different
disks
to the filesystems that they server - and preferably on low-activity disks.
Use of inline logs would prevent that and would surely mean that every time
the filesystem was updated you've got to go to the part of the filesystem
which has the log, then back for the next update, back to the log etc.
-- Simon Green Altria ITSC Europe Ltd AIX-L Archive at https://new-lists.princeton.edu/listserv/aix-l.html New to AIX? http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/redbooks.nsf/portals/UNIX N.B. Unsolicited email from vendors will not be appreciated. Please post all follow-ups to the list. > -----Original Message----- > From: Mills, John T (9814) [mailto:John.T.Mills@ERAC.COM] > Sent: 12 July 2004 15:28 > To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU > Subject: Re: JFS2 - good or bad? > > > I'd do it for one reason. When I make a 1/2 TB filesystem it > registers as 1% full instead of 4%. Also the INLINE jfs2 > logs have good potential.
- Previous message: Jan-Frode Myklebust: "Re: SSA error message what it mean?"
- In reply to: Green, Simon: "Re: JFS2 - good or bad?"
- Next in thread: John Jolet: "Re: JFS2 - good or bad?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|