Re: AIX 5.2 verses AIX 5.3
From: Gene Sais (Gsais_at_CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US)
Date: 10/07/04
- Previous message: Green, Simon: "Re: monitoring performance from tape? [Virus checked]"
- Maybe in reply to: cbaker_at_GOODYEAR.COM: "AIX 5.2 verses AIX 5.3"
- Next in thread: Mills, John T (9814): "Re: AIX 5.2 verses AIX 5.3"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 17:54:12 -0400 To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
Before acting on this e-mail or opening any attachments you are advised to read The Caudwell Holdings group of companies' disclaimer at the end of this e-mail.
--------------------------------------------------------
I would never do multiple upgrades together (EMC & AIX). Do EMC this
weekend and AIX ML patches another day. Why mix up the variables :).
>>> cbaker@GOODYEAR.COM 10/7/2004 5:40:40 PM >>>
Folks,
Sorry, have been away for a couple months so this question may have
been asked.
We have two IBM P655 that fill a very critical role. Because EMC would
not bless AIX 5.2 when we first got these systems, we stayed
back on AIX 5.1. Now, we are about to have a major maintenance weekend
and we are going to newer EMC hardware and software. So, my
question is, do I take this opportunity to upgrade these two servers to
AIX 5.2 ML?? (that I know is blessed by EMC, has been out for
quite some time, is on all my other P655's and is stable)? Or do I
jump to latest ML of AIX 5.3?
I have heard very little about AIX 5.3 so maybe it is obviously not
ready for critical servers? Or has it too been debugged by many
sites using it? If you recommend 5.3, are there ML's and which one do
I want to go too?
Thanks,
Christopher M. Baker
Senior Technical Support Analyst
DSE/TCO
Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company
=================================================
Contains Confidential and/or Proprietary Information.
May not be copied or disseminated without the expressed
written consent of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company.
=================================================
--------------------------------------------------------
Confidentiality Notice
This e-mail is confidential and intended for the use of the named recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us by telephone immediately on +44(0)1782 600600 or return it to us by e-mail. Please then delete it from your system and note that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying is strictly prohibited.
Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Caudwell Holdings group of companies.
Encryptions and VirusesPlease note that this e-mail and any attachments have not been encrypted. They may therefore be liable to be compromised. Please also note that it is your responsibility to scan this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. We do not, to the extent permitted by law, accept any liability (whether in contract, negligence or otherwise) for any virus infection and/or external compromise of security and/or confidentiality in relation to transmissions sent by e-mail.
Monitoring Activity and use of The Caudwell Holdings group of companies' systems is monitored to secure its effective use and operation and for other lawful business purposes. Communications using these systems will also be monitored and may be recorded to secure effective use and operation and for other lawful business purposes.
- Previous message: Green, Simon: "Re: monitoring performance from tape? [Virus checked]"
- Maybe in reply to: cbaker_at_GOODYEAR.COM: "AIX 5.2 verses AIX 5.3"
- Next in thread: Mills, John T (9814): "Re: AIX 5.2 verses AIX 5.3"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
