Re: AIX 5.2 verses AIX 5.3
From: JOSEPH KREMBLAS (JKREMBLAS_at_REDHEARTGIFTS.COM)
Date: 10/08/04
- Previous message: Bob.Kelley_at_BRINKSINC.COM: "Re: AIX 5.2 verses AIX 5.3"
- In reply to: cbaker_at_GOODYEAR.COM: "Re: AIX 5.2 verses AIX 5.3"
- Next in thread: JOSEPH KREMBLAS: "Re: AIX 5.2 verses AIX 5.3"
- Reply: JOSEPH KREMBLAS: "Re: AIX 5.2 verses AIX 5.3"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 08:38:11 -0700 To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
LOL. It sounds like choosing between the lesser of two evils, to me.
What's the story with ML03?
--joseph
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM AIX Discussion List [mailto:aix-l@Princeton.EDU] On Behalf Of
cbaker@GOODYEAR.COM
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 8:20 AM
To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
Subject: Re: AIX 5.2 verses AIX 5.3
Well, John, that is a truly rosy picture.
So, which poison do you recommend? Sounds like ML04 or ML02?
Christopher M. Baker
Senior Technical Support Analyst
DSE/TCO
Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company
=================================================
Contains Confidential and/or Proprietary Information.
May not be copied or disseminated without the expressed
written consent of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company.
=================================================
"Mills, John T (9814)"
<John.T.Mills@ERAC.COM>
Sent by: IBM AIX Discussion List
To
<aix-l@Princeton.EDU>
aix-l@Princeton.EDU
cc
10/08/04 09:58 AM
Subject
Re: AIX
5.2 verses AIX 5.3
Please respond to
IBM AIX Discussion List
<aix-l@Princeton.EDU>
5.2 ML0
Too many problems to list.
5.2 ML1
Several crash fixes, but automount/nfs is horrible
5.2 ML2
Several crash fixes, many nfs/autofs fixes, broke some HACMP (tcpip
changes) and Oracle (ipcrm and wouldn't start) 5.2 ML3
Key word is Corruption, as in jfs/jfs2
5.2 ML4
Haven't seen anything yet.
John T. Mills
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM AIX Discussion List [mailto:aix-l@Princeton.EDU]On Behalf Of
cbaker@GOODYEAR.COM
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 4:41 PM
To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
Subject: [aix-l] AIX 5.2 verses AIX 5.3
Folks,
Sorry, have been away for a couple months so this question may have been
asked.
We have two IBM P655 that fill a very critical role. Because EMC would
not bless AIX 5.2 when we first got these systems, we stayed back on AIX
5.1. Now, we are about to have a major maintenance weekend and we are
going to newer EMC hardware and software. So, my question is, do I take
this opportunity to upgrade these two servers to AIX 5.2 ML?? (that I
know is blessed by EMC, has been out for
quite some time, is on all my other P655's and is stable)? Or do I
jump to latest ML of AIX 5.3?
I have heard very little about AIX 5.3 so maybe it is obviously not
ready for critical servers? Or has it too been debugged by many sites
using it? If you recommend 5.3, are there ML's and which one do I want
to go too?
Thanks,
Christopher M. Baker
Senior Technical Support Analyst
DSE/TCO
Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company
=================================================
Contains Confidential and/or Proprietary Information.
May not be copied or disseminated without the expressed
written consent of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company.
=================================================
- Previous message: Bob.Kelley_at_BRINKSINC.COM: "Re: AIX 5.2 verses AIX 5.3"
- In reply to: cbaker_at_GOODYEAR.COM: "Re: AIX 5.2 verses AIX 5.3"
- Next in thread: JOSEPH KREMBLAS: "Re: AIX 5.2 verses AIX 5.3"
- Reply: JOSEPH KREMBLAS: "Re: AIX 5.2 verses AIX 5.3"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|