Re: timeout by DNS? [Virus checked]
From: Hans-Dieter Kutz (hdkutz_at_HDKUTZ.DE)
Date: 11/23/04
- Previous message: Holger.VanKoll_at_SWISSCOM.COM: "Re: timeout by DNS? [Virus checked]"
- In reply to: Holger.VanKoll_at_SWISSCOM.COM: "Re: timeout by DNS? [Virus checked]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 12:48:19 +0100 To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 12:25:38PM +0100, Holger.VanKoll@SWISSCOM.COM wrote:
> >Now I change the first entrie to a wrong IP-adress for the first
> nameserver, the nslookup needs a long time to go to the second
> nameserver.
> then, dont do that ;-)
>
> >Now my question is, what is the parameter to tune the timeout for DNS?
>
> well, the timeouts for nslookup , host, dig are different - so it looks
> like its up to the application
> nslookup has (afair) a -timeout= option
>
> I doubt there is a system-wide parameter that you can tune
>
> if dns-response time is critical, run a local caching-only nameserver
Hmm. Why isn't "options rotate" like in Linux or Solaris implemented in AIX?
Recently we had a problem with our Production Nameserver. All Solaris and Linux
Boxes went fine, only AIX got into trouble resolving Names from the secondary
Nameserver, waiting for timeout of the primary DNS.
Cheers,
ku
--
C-3PO:
Sir, the possibility of successfully navigating
an asteroid field is approximately 3,720 to 1!
Han Solo:
Never tell me the odds!
- Previous message: Holger.VanKoll_at_SWISSCOM.COM: "Re: timeout by DNS? [Virus checked]"
- In reply to: Holger.VanKoll_at_SWISSCOM.COM: "Re: timeout by DNS? [Virus checked]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|