Antwort: Re: timeout by DNS? [Virus checked]
fmu_at_OERAG.DE
Date: 11/23/04
- Previous message: Vesna Vranesic: "Antwort: Re: timeout by DNS? [Virus checked]"
- Next in thread: Holger.VanKoll_at_SWISSCOM.COM: "Re: Antwort: Re: timeout by DNS? [Virus checked]"
- Maybe reply: Holger.VanKoll_at_SWISSCOM.COM: "Re: Antwort: Re: timeout by DNS? [Virus checked]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:34:47 +0100 To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
Hi Vesna,
thanks for your answer.
Your explanation is good and something about this I found in the Internet.
Which I do not understand, if the first entry is wrong or the first
nameserver was crashed, the second entry should function after 5 seconds.
But why functioned that not and it does run all cycles through (75s).
Best regards,
Frank Mueller
Vesna Vranesic
<vesna.vranesic@R An: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
ZB.AT> Kopie:
Gesendet von: IBM Thema: Antwort: Re: timeout by DNS? [Virus checked]
AIX Discussion
List
<aix-l@Princeton.
EDU>
23.11.2004 13:17
Bitte antworten
an IBM AIX
Discussion List
The quotation I have found few years ago about this issue:
"On AIX, a DNS query will wait a total of 75 seconds before
failing over to the second nameserver entry in the resolv.conf.
The 75 sec timeout period comes from two values RES_RETRY and
RES_TIMEOUT. The way it works is the dns client will try to contact the
dns server, then if it doesn't get an answer back it will wait 5 seconds
and try again, then it will wait 10 secs and try again, 20 sec and try
again, 40 secs and try again.
.
5 + 10 + 20 + 40 = 75 seconds
If you want to change these on the dns client do the following:
.
# export RES_RETRY=value
# export RES_TIMEOUT=value
.
The timeout is defined by two values :
RES_TIMEOUT (default 5 sec)
RES_RETRY (defautl 4 times)
Each retry the initial timeout value is multipied by 2
.
Example :
5 + 10 + 20 + 40 = 75 <--- default timeout
.
The Cust can export other values to change this behaviour
.
Example :
export RES_TIMEOUT=10
export RES_RETRY=2
.
10 + 20 = 30 seconds timeout
.
In order for these to remain in effect after a reboot you need to vi
/etc/environment and add these in the file."
I am not sure if something has changed recently (read: for AIX5L).
Ciao
Vesna
|---------+--------------------------------->
| | |
| | hdkutz@HDKUTZ.DE |
| | |
| | Gesendet von: |
| | aix-l@Princeton.EDU |
| | 23.11.2004 12:48 |
| | Bitte antworten an |
| | aix-l |
| | |
|---------+--------------------------------->
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
|An: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
|
|Kopie:
|
|Blindkopie:
|
|Thema: Re: timeout by DNS? [Virus checked]
|
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 12:25:38PM +0100, Holger.VanKoll@SWISSCOM.COM
wrote:
> >Now I change the first entrie to a wrong IP-adress for the first
> nameserver, the nslookup needs a long time to go to the second
> nameserver.
> then, dont do that ;-)
>
> >Now my question is, what is the parameter to tune the timeout for DNS?
>
> well, the timeouts for nslookup , host, dig are different - so it looks
> like its up to the application
> nslookup has (afair) a -timeout= option
>
> I doubt there is a system-wide parameter that you can tune
>
> if dns-response time is critical, run a local caching-only nameserver
Hmm. Why isn't "options rotate" like in Linux or Solaris implemented in
AIX?
Recently we had a problem with our Production Nameserver. All Solaris and
Linux
Boxes went fine, only AIX got into trouble resolving Names from the
secondary
Nameserver, waiting for timeout of the primary DNS.
Cheers,
ku
--
C-3PO:
Sir, the possibility of successfully navigating
an asteroid field is approximately 3,720 to 1!
Han Solo:
Never tell me the odds!
This message and any attachment ("the Message") are confidential. If you
have received the Message in error, please notify the sender immediately
and delete the Message from your system , any use of the Message is
forbidden.
Correspondence via e-mail is primarily for information purposes. RZB
neither makes nor accepts legally binding statements unless otherwise
agreed to the contrary.
- Previous message: Vesna Vranesic: "Antwort: Re: timeout by DNS? [Virus checked]"
- Next in thread: Holger.VanKoll_at_SWISSCOM.COM: "Re: Antwort: Re: timeout by DNS? [Virus checked]"
- Maybe reply: Holger.VanKoll_at_SWISSCOM.COM: "Re: Antwort: Re: timeout by DNS? [Virus checked]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|