Re: 4.3.3 ML levels
Holger.VanKoll_at_SWISSCOM.COM
Date: 12/21/04
- Previous message: Chafik,Basim: "Re: 4.3.3 ML levels"
- Maybe in reply to: Darryl Ousterhout: "4.3.3 ML levels"
- Next in thread: Justin Bleistein: "Re: 4.3.3 ML levels"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:12:40 +0100 To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
9 was fine besides one memory leak
10 was best, but 11 wasnt really worse; just didnt install that on many
nodes
________________________________
From: IBM AIX Discussion List [mailto:aix-l@Princeton.EDU] On Behalf Of
Darryl Ousterhout
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 3:50 PM
To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
Subject: 4.3.3 ML levels
Folks,
Just a quick question. I have most 4.3.3 systems at level 8. What was
the next stable level? I know either 9 or 11 had bugs and 10 was good,
or 11 is good and 9, 10 had bugs. By rule with 4.3.3 ML sets, all the
odd levels were bad. Anyone remember?
Regards,
Darryl
- Previous message: Chafik,Basim: "Re: 4.3.3 ML levels"
- Maybe in reply to: Darryl Ousterhout: "4.3.3 ML levels"
- Next in thread: Justin Bleistein: "Re: 4.3.3 ML levels"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]