Re: SSA vs SCSI - general IO troubleshooting

From: Patrick B. O'Brien (pobrien_at_DOIT.NV.GOV)
Date: 03/24/05

  • Next message: Hunter, Mark: "Re: SSA vs SCSI - general IO troubleshooting"
    Date:         Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:02:07 -0800
    To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
    
    

    I/O seems to be the bottleneck for me, mostly.

    You might look at 5L's migratelp.

    You'd first run lvmstat -e -v vg_name to find your hotspots.

    The man for these looks good.

    ________________________________

    From: IBM AIX Discussion List [mailto:aix-l@Princeton.EDU] On Behalf Of
    Mark Schlechte
    Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 8:46 AM
    To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
    Subject: SSA vs SCSI - general IO troubleshooting

     

    I'm trying to figure out what kind of performance differences there are
    between good ol SSA compared to some SCSI Ultra 320 disks or even if
    that is my problem.

    Server A is a 6-way 6F1 668MHZ, 8GB ram with a number of internal SSA
    disks and 13 oracle databases.

    The disk is a mix of some RAID5, and RAID1 over 2 adapters.

     

    Server B is a 2-way 6C3 1.2GHZ, 2GB ram with 6 SCSI disks and 4 oracle
    databases.

    This disk is just JBOD using a single 6203 SCSI adapter.

     

    Due to oracle licensing costs we are moving one of the databases off the
    6F1 onto the 2-way 6C3.

    Our testing indicates very high I/O rates on the SCSI disk and tasks
    take way to long to complete.

    I'm wondering where I should focus my effort on trying to aleviate the
    disk I/O bottleneck.

    Is it SSA vs SCSI, the adapter (cache on the SSA adapter), more memory,
    should I look at vmtune settings, etc.

     

    I did run filemon while testing was going on.

    CPU utilization is 67.7%

    Most active Segments (all page table entries)

    Most Active Physical Volumes (all hdisks show util 1.00)

     

    Lots of questions I know, just looking for any general comments on where
    people would start first.

     

    Mark

     

    DISCLAIMER: The information transmitted is intended only
    for the addressee and may contain confidential,
    proprietary and/or privileged material. Any
    unauthorized review, distribution or other use
    of or the taking of any action in reliance upon
    this information is prohibited. If you received
    this in error, please contact the sender and
    delete or destroy this message and any copies.
            


  • Next message: Hunter, Mark: "Re: SSA vs SCSI - general IO troubleshooting"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Split I/Os to contiguous file???
      ... Most if not all SCSI port drivers limit transfers to 64KB. ... I/O, other I/O gets starved. ... disk driver to single stream mode, i.e., waiting for everything else. ...
      (comp.os.vms)
    • Re: SCSI vs S-ATA
      ... > How does SATA perform relative to SCSI in a multi-user environment? ... SCSI HD may queue up a number of disk I/O requests onboard and choose the ... The host CPU issue is relevant for RAID. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • SSA vs SCSI - general IO troubleshooting
      ... I'm trying to figure out what kind of performance differences there are between good ol SSA compared to some SCSI Ultra 320 disks or even if that is my problem. ... The disk is a mix of some RAID5, ... Is it SSA vs SCSI, the adapter, more memory, should I look at vmtune settings, etc. ...
      (AIX-L)
    • Re: SSA vs SCSI - general IO troubleshooting
      ... My Experience is SSA give better IO performance specially if the SSA adapter ... SSA vs SCSI - general IO troubleshooting ... This disk is just JBOD using a single 6203 SCSI adapter. ...
      (AIX-L)
    • Re: separate hard drive for scratch disks for two different programs?
      ... measures out at a higher speed than the 750GB SATA ... much faster using the middle cylinders than the SCSI ... This is a function of the way the OS deals with the disk, ... of sharing the load between multiple drives, ...
      (rec.photo.digital.slr-systems)