Re: IBM FastT vs. EMC Clarion
From: Patrick B. O'Brien (pobrien_at_DOIT.NV.GOV)
Date: 03/24/05
- Previous message: Wheelock, Michael D: "Re: IBM FastT vs. EMC Clarion"
- Maybe in reply to: glh_at_DAIRYNET.COM: "IBM FastT vs. EMC Clarion"
- Next in thread: Justin Bleistein: "Re: IBM FastT vs. EMC Clarion"
- Reply: Justin Bleistein: "Re: IBM FastT vs. EMC Clarion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:00:29 -0800 To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
The best thing about staying with an all IBM Shop is one call,
theoretically, gets you help until the problem is solved.
Having both EMC and IBM, I've found, finger pointing goes on and that is
time consuming and frustrating.
I don't think IBM plays ball nicely with anybody; for a good reasons.
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM AIX Discussion List [mailto:aix-l@Princeton.EDU] On Behalf Of
glh@DAIRYNET.COM
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 9:31 AM
To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
Subject: IBM FastT vs. EMC Clarion
We are in the process of selecting our first SAN for our environment -
approximately 10 AIX servers and 3 Windows servers. We've narrowed our
choices down to either an IBM DS4300 Turbo (old FastT) or the EMC
CLARiion
CX500. For those of you who may have worked with either (or both) of
these
products, what is your overall opinion of the product? Would you buy
that
product again? Any positive or negative comments would be greatly
appreciated. Thanks.
- Previous message: Wheelock, Michael D: "Re: IBM FastT vs. EMC Clarion"
- Maybe in reply to: glh_at_DAIRYNET.COM: "IBM FastT vs. EMC Clarion"
- Next in thread: Justin Bleistein: "Re: IBM FastT vs. EMC Clarion"
- Reply: Justin Bleistein: "Re: IBM FastT vs. EMC Clarion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
