Re: DNS Round Robin

From: Lamar Saxon (Lamar.Saxon_at_AMERICREDIT.COM)
Date: 05/26/05

  • Next message: Green, Simon: "Dump debugging without "crash"" 
    Date:         Wed, 25 May 2005 17:01:31 -0500
To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU

    Just 2 A records with the same name.

    xxxx@xxxxxx:/home/xxxxxxx:> nsupdate
    > update add test.americredit.com 36000 in a 10.xxx.3.244
    > update add test.americredit.com 36000 in a 10.xxx.3.245

    root@aocdns:/home/lsaxon1:> nslookup
    Default Server: localhost
    Address: 127.0.0.1

    > test
    Server: localhost
    Address: 127.0.0.1

    Name: test.americredit.com
    Addresses: 10.xxx.3.244, 10.xxx.3.245

    xxxx@xxxxxx:/home/xxxxxxx:> ping test
    PING test.americredit.com: (10.xxx.3.244): 56 data bytes
    ----test.americredit.com PING Statistics----
    1 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss

    xxxx@xxxxxx:/home/xxxxxxx:> ping test
    PING test.americredit.com: (10.xxx.3.245): 56 data bytes
    ----test.americredit.com PING Statistics----
    1 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss

    Lamar

    -----Original Message-----
    From: IBM AIX Discussion List [mailto:aix-l@Princeton.EDU] On Behalf Of
    Yard, John
    Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 4:54 PM
    To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
    Subject: DNS Round Robin

    I am researching implementing
    LDAP Directory Server and the docs
    refer to DNS round robin as an availability
    consideration.

    I am using named 8.2.2 on AIX 5.1,

    JYard
    UCLA

    Privileged and Confidential. This e-mail, and any attachments there to, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain privileged or confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify me immediately by a return e-mail and delete this e-mail. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and/or any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.

  • Next message: Green, Simon: "Dump debugging without "crash""

    Relevant Pages

    • The problem of connection between Windows and FreeBSD when using IPSec transport.
      ... If I start pinging under Windows everything works ok, ... PING 111.111.111.1: 56 data bytes ... packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss ... matter from which server I initiate the connection? ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: [opensuse] GSOC 2008
      ... server info by reading the packets they send back. ... Then I guess we're talking about something other than ping. ... popups to tell them which machines they can connect to using their ...
      (SuSE)
    • The problem of connection between Windows and FreeBSD when using IPSec transport.
      ... If I start pinging under Windows everything works ok, ... PING 111.111.111.1: 56 data bytes ... packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss ... IPSec properly work no matter from which server I initiate the ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • em device on 4.x: ifconfig alias issue
      ... When I alias a new IP onto an em device running on a 4-STABLE server, for some reason, it isn't seeing appropriate 'arp' messages, so the upstream switches and such aren't getting the information .... ... All the local server can ping the IP, but, for instance, the Cisco 2950 that all the servers are plugged into can't: ... Type escape sequence to abort. ... packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0% packet loss ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: Very weird ping problem
      ... I am guessing because ICMP (ping) packets are normally blocked by ... I am guessing that the server tcp stack sees the ... so maybe it is a SBS thing. ...
      (microsoft.public.security)