Re: GPFS or RAW for HACMP and Oracle RAC?

From: Morris, Carey B (CBMorris_at_PIER1.COM)
Date: 06/29/05

  • Next message: Bob.Kelley_at_BRINKSINC.COM: "Re: GPFS or RAW for HACMP and Oracle RAC?" 
    Date:         Wed, 29 Jun 2005 15:38:20 -0500
To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU

    What we're being told by our IBM partner is that for a small cluster (2
    or 3 servers) GPFS is overkill. HACMP will do fine because all you
    really need is the ability to use enhanced concurrent volume groups -
    which HACMP provides.

    The question we're still trying to get an answer for is whether you
    still need HACMP for Oracle 10g since 10g comes with the new CRS
    feature.

    Carey Morris

    -----Original Message-----
    From: IBM AIX Discussion List [mailto:aix-l@Princeton.EDU] On Behalf Of
    Bob.Kelley@BRINKSINC.COM
    Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 2:34 PM
    To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
    Subject: GPFS or RAW for HACMP and Oracle RAC?

    Anybody care to comment in the pros and cons of using GPFS as opposed to
    RAW for HACMP 5.1 and Oracle RAC?

    Bobby Kelley Jr.
    972-877-5341

  • Next message: Bob.Kelley_at_BRINKSINC.COM: "Re: GPFS or RAW for HACMP and Oracle RAC?"

    Relevant Pages