Re: GPFS or RAW for HACMP and Oracle RAC?
Bob.Kelley_at_BRINKSINC.COM
Date: 06/29/05
- Previous message: Morris, Carey B: "Re: GPFS or RAW for HACMP and Oracle RAC?"
- In reply to: Morris, Carey B: "Re: GPFS or RAW for HACMP and Oracle RAC?"
- Next in thread: Jan-Frode Myklebust: "Re: GPFS or RAW for HACMP and Oracle RAC?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 16:11:15 -0500 To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
Thanks for the reply. I got that same pitch about CRS or whatever they call
it. Not sure I'm confident on that just yet but it seems to replace HACMP!
So Oracle RAC supports JFS and RAW or just RAW?
Bobby Kelley Jr.
972-877-5341
"Morris, Carey B"
<CBMorris@PIER1.C
OM> To
Sent by: IBM AIX aix-l@Princeton.EDU
Discussion List cc
<aix-l@Princeton.
EDU> Subject
Re: GPFS or RAW for HACMP and
Oracle RAC?
06/29/2005 03:38
PM
Please respond to
IBM AIX
Discussion List
<aix-l@Princeton.
EDU>
What we're being told by our IBM partner is that for a small cluster (2
or 3 servers) GPFS is overkill. HACMP will do fine because all you
really need is the ability to use enhanced concurrent volume groups -
which HACMP provides.
The question we're still trying to get an answer for is whether you
still need HACMP for Oracle 10g since 10g comes with the new CRS
feature.
Carey Morris
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM AIX Discussion List [mailto:aix-l@Princeton.EDU] On Behalf Of
Bob.Kelley@BRINKSINC.COM
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 2:34 PM
To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
Subject: GPFS or RAW for HACMP and Oracle RAC?
Anybody care to comment in the pros and cons of using GPFS as opposed to
RAW for HACMP 5.1 and Oracle RAC?
Bobby Kelley Jr.
972-877-5341
- Previous message: Morris, Carey B: "Re: GPFS or RAW for HACMP and Oracle RAC?"
- In reply to: Morris, Carey B: "Re: GPFS or RAW for HACMP and Oracle RAC?"
- Next in thread: Jan-Frode Myklebust: "Re: GPFS or RAW for HACMP and Oracle RAC?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|