Re: System VPD showing 'incorrect' serial number

From: BRUCE HARVEY (btharvey_at_MANDTBANK.COM)
Date: 08/12/05

  • Next message: oscar torres carranza: "problem with awk"
    Date:         Fri, 12 Aug 2005 07:47:07 -0400
    To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
    
    

    Ahh ... we're preparing for our own rather unique ... "business
    continuity" ... test ourselves. I quite understand.
     
    However, in our case, even though it *will* get things moving, *I'll*
    be held responsible, not purchasing. Here, purchasing does what we tell
    them to do, and upper management does not hold *them* responsible.
     
    But in any event, have some tea ... perhaps a dram of stimulant as well
    ... for a completed job, whether or not things worked as expected.
     
    Bruce

    >>> Simon.Green@EU.ALTRIA.COM 8/12/2005 7:19:08 AM >>>

    There are two big advantages to this approach.
    1. Something happens. Maybe you don't know quite what, but it *will*
    get things moving.
    2. It all ends up as somebody else's problem. (Some poor sod in your
    purchasing dept, or wherever, but not you!)
     
    I'm sure I've managed to irritate a few people before now. I've just
    got back from a particularly stressful DR test, so I'm in a slightly odd
    mood at the moment: relieved to be back, frustrated that things didn't
    work terribly well, (or at all!) and rather tired.
     

    Simon

    -----Original Message-----
    From: IBM AIX Discussion List [mailto:aix-l@Princeton.EDU] On Behalf Of
    BRUCE HARVEY
    Sent: 12 August 2005 12:00
    To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
    Subject: Re: System VPD showing 'incorrect' serial number

    Simon,
     
    I don't think I've ever ... well, "heard" isn't quite right ... "read"
    you belligerent before! But of course, IBM being the thoughtful,
    insightful, kind and well-meaning philanthropic organisation that they
    are, the withholding of payments in this manner will result in the
    immediate assignment of the correct C.E. to handle our case. ("C.E.,"
    in this case, means "Cash Extractor" ... lawyer, solicitor, etc.,
    depending on where you reside.)
     
    Bruce

    >>> Simon.Green@EU.ALTRIA.COM 8/12/2005 5:28:09 AM >>>

    You could always suspend all payments relating to this mythical machine
    "10-1122A" unless they can prove you really have it installed
    somewhere.
     
    I think I'd take that track, and just throw the problem at your finance
    people. Mind you, I'm feeling especially belligerent today, so don't be
    too hasty. :-)
     

    -- 
    Simon Green                                                            
                  
    Altria ITSC Europe s.a.r.l.AIX-L Archive at
    https://new-lists.princeton.edu/listserv/aix-l.htmlNew to AIX?
    http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/redbooks.nsf/portals/UNIX N.B.
    Unsolicited email from vendors will not be appreciated.Please post all
    follow-ups to the list.
    -----Original Message-----
    From: IBM AIX Discussion List [mailto:aix-l@Princeton.EDU] On Behalf Of
    Robert Miller
    Sent: 11 August 2005 17:56
    To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
    Subject: Re: System VPD showing 'incorrect' serial number
    Personally, I'd tell them to send a CE out and verify that it says what
    you see that it says.  I've had fun dealing with IBM and their wonderful
    machine database(s)... where one side of the house thinks it's installed
    in New York, even though they have sent out a CE to verify that it's
    installed at your site...
    ...twice...
     
    So, good luck getting IBM to fix their database info - but that really
    is what you need to do, IMO... my sympathies.
     
    --rm
    -----Original Message-----
    From: IBM AIX Discussion List [mailto:aix-l@Princeton.EDU]On Behalf Of
    BRUCE HARVEY
    Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 9:39 AM
    To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
    Subject: System VPD showing 'incorrect' serial number
    All ...
     
    I've got a power4 p630, 7028-6C4 whose vital product data shows (when I
    execute lscfg -vp) the serial number to be 10-11224 ... and IBM and
    Agilysys (who we bought it through) show it to be 10-1122A, and they're
    telling me I'm wrong.
     
    Do I need to change the VPD?  If so, how?  Diag would seem to be the
    way to go, but it won't go there that I can find.
     
    Do I need to get a 2x4 and convince IBM and Agilysys that their records
    are faulty (misread by someone and now semi-permanently etched into the
    consciousness of both corporations) and try to get them to change things
    ...
     
     ... so that when I have a hardware problem and need to call Hardware
    Support and can't get into the Data Center because of rules (so can't
    view the label that says, "really -A," on the front of the cabinet) and
    I execute lscfg -vp to get the cabinet serial number I won't be sent to
    entitlement?  (*pant*) (*pant*)
    

  • Next message: oscar torres carranza: "problem with awk"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: System VPD showing incorrect serial number
      ... System VPD showing 'incorrect' serial number ... I've had fun dealing with IBM and their wonderful machine ... so that when I have a hardware problem and need to call Hardware ...
      (AIX-L)
    • Re: System VPD showing incorrect serial number
      ... System VPD showing 'incorrect' serial number ... each individual in different parts of "IBM" throughout the "world". ... Bruce T. Harvey ...
      (AIX-L)
    • Re: System VPD showing incorrect serial number
      ... You could always suspend all payments relating to this mythical machine ... System VPD showing 'incorrect' serial number ... good luck getting IBM to fix their database info - but that really is ... so that when I have a hardware problem and need to call Hardware ...
      (AIX-L)
    • Re: System VPD showing incorrect serial number
      ... The 'sticker' on the front is hard to read ... ... each individual in different parts of "IBM" throughout the "world". ... System VPD showing 'incorrect' serial number ... Bruce T. Harvey ...
      (AIX-L)
    • Re: The SCOG rollercoaster ride,,,
      ... >enough to go to court with IBM let alone any other defendants. ... Incorrect. ...
      (comp.unix.sco.misc)