Re: fsck skips phase 0
From: Green, Simon (Simon.Green_at_EU.ALTRIA.COM)
Date: 10/17/05
- Previous message: Bob Booth - UIUC: "Re: fsck skips phase 0"
- Maybe in reply to: Willeat, Todd: "fsck skips phase 0"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:35:10 +0200 To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
Usually that would be because the system crashed whilst a filesystem was
open.
-- Simon Green Altria ITSC Europe s.a.r.l. AIX-L Archive at https://new-lists.princeton.edu/listserv/aix-l.html New to AIX? http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/redbooks.nsf/portals/UNIX N.B. Unsolicited email from vendors will not be appreciated. Please post all follow-ups to the list. -----Original Message----- From: IBM AIX Discussion List [mailto:aix-l@Princeton.EDU] On Behalf Of Bob Booth - UIUC Sent: 16 October 2005 15:30 To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU Subject: Re: fsck skips phase 0 On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 12:25:16AM -0500, Willeat, Todd wrote: > If unmounting the filesystems flushes the log, then wouldn't the log always > be empty? And I would never see phase 0? Correct, you *should* never see phase 0. There may be reasons beyond documentation and experience that cause the log to remain dirty when a filesystem is closed.. bob
- Previous message: Bob Booth - UIUC: "Re: fsck skips phase 0"
- Maybe in reply to: Willeat, Todd: "fsck skips phase 0"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|