Re: difference in lsfs and lsvg
- From: Jeff Barratt-McCartney <jbarratt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 12:32:18 -0400
sounds like you didnt choose jfs2 at install time
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM AIX Discussion List on behalf of Holger.VanKoll@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tue 4/4/2006 9:40 AM
To: aix-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: difference in lsfs and lsvg
what does /etc/filesystems say for:
/
/usr
/var
I assume they are using the jfs2log.
they use hd8 which has the type "jfs" (not: "jfslog") in lslv hd8
and what is in the type field for
lslv lvname
jfs
was this an upgrade or a fresh install?
fresh install
you can change the type with chlv -t jfs2 lvname
yes, but does this get me further? I still dont really know what fs-type
I have
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM AIX Discussion List on behalf of Holger.VanKoll@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Mon 4/3/2006 3:14 PM
To: aix-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: difference in lsfs and lsvg
Hello,
lsfs shows the filesystems of rootvg as jfs2. I am also quite sure I
created them as jfs2.
However, lsvg -l rootvg shows jfs and (f.e.) lslv hd4 also shows jfs.
Already tried redefinevg and synclvodm, no effect.
It looks like the fs are really jfs2 as I can decrease them:
(0)root@sbe18956 539# chfs -a size=+1 /root Filesystem size changed to
524288
(0)root@sbe18956 540# df -k /root
Filesystem 1024-blocks Free %Used Iused %Iused Mounted on
/dev/rootlv 262144 167084 37% 55 1% /root
(0)root@sbe18956 541# chfs -a size=-1 /root Minimum size to be reduced
is 1 physical partition (128 MB).
(0)root@sbe18956 542# chfs -a size=-128M /root Filesystem size changed
to 262144
(0)root@sbe18956 543# df -k /root
Filesystem 1024-blocks Free %Used Iused %Iused Mounted on
/dev/rootlv 131072 36032 73% 55 1% /root
(0)root@sbe18956 544# lslv rootlv
LOGICAL VOLUME: rootlv VOLUME GROUP: rootvg
LV IDENTIFIER: 00ced89d00004c0000000103c425d7f9.11 PERMISSION:
read/write
VG STATE: active/complete LV STATE: opened/syncd
TYPE: jfs WRITE VERIFY: off
...
I am a bit confused about the error-msg "Minimum size to be reduced is 1
physical partition (128 MB).", but this is not the problem here...
Am I correct that one cannot decrease a jfs-filesystem, so, I have
jfs2-filesystems?
How could I fix the output of lsvg and lslv (showing jfs as fs-type).
Btw. there are jfs2-fs in rootvg... all that I added manually after
installing. But / /var /tmp /usr etc. show up as jfs.
There is not even a jfslog... only a jfs2log.
Regards, Holger
(130)root@sbe18956 551# lsvg -l rootvg
rootvg:
LV NAME TYPE LPs PPs PVs LV STATE MOUNT
POINT
...
rootlv jfs 1 2 2 open/syncd /root
...
(1)root@sbe18956 553# lslv rootlv
LOGICAL VOLUME: rootlv VOLUME GROUP: rootvg
LV IDENTIFIER: 00ced89d00004c0000000103c425d7f9.11 PERMISSION:
read/write
VG STATE: active/complete LV STATE: opened/syncd
TYPE: jfs WRITE VERIFY: off
...
- References:
- Re: difference in lsfs and lsvg
- From: Holger . VanKoll
- Re: difference in lsfs and lsvg
- Prev by Date: Re: How to add raw disk?
- Next by Date: Re: difference in lsfs and lsvg
- Previous by thread: Re: difference in lsfs and lsvg
- Next by thread: Re: difference in lsfs and lsvg
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|