Re: Oracle RAC and raw disks



I'm not questioning whether raw devices are OK. I understand their performance benefits and their management challenges. I was merely trying to point out what factors might be underlying the DBA's motivation to use Oracle to manage the raw devices, essentially taking the storage management task out of the hands of the sysadmins.

AIX-Geek's issue of having storage that's not managed by AIX is a valid one, and can only be reconciled through appropriate system management procedures, unless Oracle's ASM has some sort of means of preventing AIX from creating volume groups on ASM-managed resources, which I doubt.

The problem is, the DBA can use ASM to circumvent the "typical" AIX-centric process for creating raw logical volumes that you described in your reply. ASM can use the raw disk devices directly to carve out its storage. It doesn't "need" logical volumes; it creates its own disk groups and storage containers. However, from LVM's point-of-view, the disks used by ASM are still available for assignment to a volume group, and if an unaware SA were to do so, the results would be catastrophic to the ASM storage containers.

This is, of course, assuming that his customer's DBA wants to use ASM to manage Oracle's storage, which appears to be the case.



-----Original Message-----
From: IBM AIX Discussion List [mailto:aix-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gergely Fóti
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 4:17 AM
To: aix-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Oracle RAC and raw disks

Even when the Customer uses Oracle9 or earlier release, raw devices are OK. You can win some performance without using file cache. But 1.) the other hand Oracle (10g) runs well with ASM; 2.) there's no problem with datafiles on file system. It is question of VMM tuning.
The raw device does not deal with hdisk at all. You make a VG, assign hdisks with that, then define LVs (as large as you wish, LV type not count, it can be anything). The raw device means the defined LV with "r" prefix (/dev/r<logical volume>), you have to refer this, when you are adding devices to database. Besides it must have readable/writable to user oracle.You cannot harm VG nor hdisk nor LV, when it is in use, so sysadmins are quite in safe. Any more questions?



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Need a link for ASM RTFM
    ... RAC requires some storage layer than can be used in a cluster; ... ASM is one of the possibilities for that (however, ... As for hw resources; ASM itself is rather tolerant; mostly, ... Supportability is then another issue -- which you would be wise to ...
    (comp.databases.oracle.server)
  • Re: Best fs for Oracle RAC
    ... about operating systems andASM is about storage. ... If you can mount a disk system you can create an ASM diskgroup. ... It is NOT the case, generically, that one single disk group is best. ...
    (comp.databases.oracle.server)
  • Re: Best fs for Oracle RAC
    ... makes turning a Windows database into a Solaris one any easier ... Your use of Windows and Solaris confuses the issue. ... about operating systems and ASM is about storage. ... The original poster wrote, "yes, and i think that ASM could be easy ...
    (comp.databases.oracle.server)
  • Re: Real storage usage - a quick question
    ... To follow-up on the case here when a DB2 DBA accidently overcommitted ... storage to DB2 an APAR PK58272 is now open against DB2 to provide a WTO ... PK58272 MAKE DSNB542I A WTO MESSAGE, SO THAT THE CHECKING OF THIS ...
    (bit.listserv.ibm-main)
  • [HPADM] RE: Input About Oracle RAC
    ... On Oracle RAC you get high-availability, load balancing, especially if you ... And do not use NAS for shared storage (via NFS ... Input About Oracle RAC ... architecture to the standard database deployments on single servers. ...
    (HP-UX-Admin)