SSA disk layout question
- From: Mark Schlechte <mschlechte@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 15:33:05 -0600
I have a 4 SSA disk drawers (no raid) shared between 5 servers and over time as disk gets shuffled from one server to another the disks assigned to a server are not next to each other (ie. disks in drive bay 1, 5 & 6 are assigned to one server while disks 2,3 & 7,8 are assigned to another server for example). The question is should I take the time to move those disks together (I guess it depends on IO load I'm seeing now and if that's an issue or not)? I know ideally they would be in the proper location depending on where the ssa cable connects also. I was thinking of doing some migratepv stuff by using an unassigned disk but that's kind of time consuming so I was thinking a physical drive bay swap is probably the fastest way of doing this during a downtime. I guess the real question is should I bother and if I do am I missing anything if i think I can just swap the drives around without any problems. I know I'll have some diocumentation to update to show what hdisks are assigned to which servers... MS
<html><body><font face = "arial" size = "1">
DISCLAIMER: The information transmitted is intended only
for the addressee and may contain confidential,
proprietary and/or privileged material. Any
unauthorized review, distribution or other use
of or the taking of any action in reliance upon
this information is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and
delete or destroy this message and any copies.
</font><body></html>
- Prev by Date: Re: linux equivalent of pc hyperterm
- Next by Date: Re: SSA disk layout question
- Previous by thread: linux equivalent of pc hyperterm
- Next by thread: Re: SSA disk layout question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
- FAST config
... DISCLAIMER: The information transmitted is intended only ... for the addressee
and may contain confidential, ... unauthorized review, distribution or other use ...
(AIX-L) - using a linux desktop and X apps
... DISCLAIMER: The information transmitted is intended only ... for the addressee
and may contain confidential, ... unauthorized review, distribution or other use ...
(AIX-L) - Re: ksh script question
... for the addressee and may contain confidential, ... unauthorized review,
distribution or other use ... of or the taking of any action in reliance upon ...
(AIX-L) - Re: date -1 question
... unauthorized review, distribution or other use ... of or the taking of any action
in reliance upon ... please contact the sender and ... (AIX-L) - Re: Cobalt
... On Thursday 10 June 2004 08:03, Alex Solla hurled the following on the wire: ...
>> DISCLAIMER ... If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, ...
> You may not want to be posting this, since the Debian lists are public ... (Debian-User)