Re: SSA disk layout question



I'd say as long as you keep good documentation and keep it straight
without getting yourself confused, don't bother. There is not much
performance difference, as long as the distance (measured in number of
devices) does not get too huge.

Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rogerd@xxxxxxx
"No one may throw an old computer across the street at their neighbor."
-- city ordinance, Warsaw, Indiana


On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Mark Schlechte wrote:


I have a 4 SSA disk drawers (no raid) shared between 5 servers and over
time as disk gets shuffled from one server to another the disks assigned
to a server are not next to each other (ie. disks in drive bay 1, 5 & 6
are assigned to one server while disks 2,3 & 7,8 are assigned to another
server for example). The question is should I take the time to move
those disks together (I guess it depends on IO load I'm seeing now and
if that's an issue or not)? I know ideally they would be in the proper
location depending on where the ssa cable connects also. I was thinking
of doing some migratepv stuff by using an unassigned disk but that's
kind of time consuming so I was thinking a physical drive bay swap is
probably the fastest way of doing this during a downtime. I guess the
real question is should I bother and if I do am I missing anything if i
think I can just swap the drives around without any problems. I know
I'll have some diocumentation to update to show what hdisks are assigned
to which servers... MS




<html><body><font face = "arial" size = "1">
DISCLAIMER: The information transmitted is intended only
for the addressee and may contain confidential,
proprietary and/or privileged material. Any
unauthorized review, distribution or other use
of or the taking of any action in reliance upon
this information is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and
delete or destroy this message and any copies.
</font><body></html>



Relevant Pages

  • hai...find me a solution in M5000 server
    ... series server. ... B B B B B i want to do install one more solaris Over there. ... Solaris cannot see all drives on Areca RAID controller ... popped it (a single disk at this point) into machine1. ...
    (SunManagers)
  • Re: sunmanagers Digest, Vol 22, Issue 12
    ... series server. ... B B B B B i want to do install one more solaris Over there. ... Solaris cannot see all drives on Areca RAID controller ... popped it (a single disk at this point) into machine1. ...
    (SunManagers)
  • Re: Disk Array Usage
    ... > server, and the rest are web, file and app servers. ... I see an array as a massive storage ... > than a disk array, why not have an actual server with a ton of space? ... If you have a number of disks which can be attached to by several machines ...
    (comp.sys.sun.hardware)
  • Re: Convert RAID1 to RAID5
    ... In a typical R5 array that is installed/setup by small shops, where they have 3xDisk for R5, you are right, but, in a proper setup where you have 5xDisks or more, then you will see a LOT of read performance that you don't get out of a Mirror - this is very much the case when you have LOTS of users accessing the server or have a SQL database that users are hitting. ... then install another RAID-0 or RAID-1 or single disk for page file, it's still not as fast as a properly configured system designed for SQL use. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • RE: sunmanagers Digest, Vol 20, Issue 34
    ... EMAIL SERVER SOFTWARE ... Solaris 8 to 9 upgrade problem with disk space ... My test device was not recognized as a disk in format, ... During the upgrade process installation I am always asked to provide ...
    (SunManagers)

Loading