Re: 3590 tapes

Actually

The 3590 holds 10/20GB
The 3590K holds 20/40GB

(Or so Imation claims)



Dave Zarnoch
davezarn@xxxxxxxxxxx





From: Bob Booth <booth@xxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: IBM AIX Discussion List <aix-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: aix-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 3590 tapes
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:16:01 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from Princeton.EDU ([128.112.131.112]) by bay0-mc6-f7.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:22:09 -0800
Received: from smtpserver1.Princeton.EDU (smtpserver1.Princeton.EDU [128.112.129.65])by Princeton.EDU (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0IIGXMZ006889;Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:16:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from lists.Princeton.EDU (listsv440.Princeton.EDU [128.112.131.10])by smtpserver1.Princeton.EDU (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l0I52fRY007402;Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:16:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: by LISTS.PRINCETON.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 14.5) with spool id 14570865 for aix-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:16:10 -0500
Received: from Princeton.EDU (postoffice04.Princeton.EDU [128.112.131.112]) by lists.Princeton.EDU (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l0IIG8Hr007874 for <aix-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:16:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from Princeton.EDU (postoffice04.Princeton.EDU [128.112.131.112]) by Princeton.EDU (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0IIG863006182 for <aix-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:16:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from emfw3.Princeton.EDU (emfw3.Princeton.EDU [128.112.129.100]) by Princeton.EDU (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0IIG281006045 for <aix-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:16:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from chianti.ci.uiuc.edu (chianti.ci.uiuc.edu [192.17.24.148]) by emfw3.Princeton.EDU (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id DF96416B947 for <aix-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:16:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from booth@localhost) by chianti.ci.uiuc.edu (AIX5.2/8.11.6p2/8.11.0) id l0IIG1036662 for aix-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:16:01 -0600
X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt2pKOqHwWpdSZLl0XOMXpfhXFFS3ettl3U=
X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1169144161-5ac400980000-b5t46D
X-Barracuda-URL: http://128.112.129.100:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi
X-Barracuda-Connect: chianti.ci.uiuc.edu[192.17.24.148]
X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1169144161
X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: 3590 tapes
References: <8243B9A9F4E44C4B996F6009E05ECE5E260B62FA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam Firewall at Princeton.EDU
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=quarantine_notspam policy=quarantine score=0 mlx=0 adultscore=0 adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=3.0.0-0612050001 definitions=main-0701180038
X-Spam-KB: http://www.Princeton.EDU/spam
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.aix-l
X-To: IBM AIX Discussion List <aix-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Precedence: list
List-Help: <https://lists.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=aix-l>, <mailto:LISTSERV@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?body=INFO aix-l>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:aix-l-unsubscribe-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:aix-l-subscribe-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-Owner: <mailto:aix-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-Archive: <https://lists.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=aix-l>
Return-Path: owner-aix-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Jan 2007 18:22:10.0209 (UTC) FILETIME=[9162D910:01C73B2D]

On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 12:26:31PM -0500, Miller, Dave (I.S.) wrote:
> Does anyone know what the distinction between 3590K and 3590 "K-LESS" or
> "no K label" is?
>
> Which one holds more data? Thanks.

They are the same, however, the ones without the barcode are to be used in
a 'ATL' environment, not a library.

hth,

bob
Ac

_________________________________________________________________
Search for grocery stores. Find gratitude. Turn a simple search into something more. http://click4thecause.live.com/search/charity/default.aspx?source=hmemtagline_gratitude&FORM=WLMTAG

Relevant Pages

  • Re: SBS 2003 Standard Restore from tape
    ... I'm sorry to hear that you can not recovery the data from original media. ... Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support ... This newsgroup only focuses on SBS technical issues. ... None of the tapes are good. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Minor Rant: Windows Update keeps fscking with me
    ... Accept-Encoding: identity ... User-Agent: Microsoft BITS/6.6 ... Host: au.download.windowsupdate.com ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Out of Box Experience for Cheetah.
    ... Out of Box Experience for Cheetah. ... bay0-mc11-f17.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, ... User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2 ... Ian Michael Gumby said: ...
    (comp.databases.informix)
  • Re: NT Backup Not Recognize Tape from another server.
    ... He has TWO tapes drives on TWO different ... servers, both DLT, one is internal and one is external. ... are your DLT tape drives the same capacity? ... Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Quantum DLTtape DLT1/VS80 error on NTbackup
    ... For that price you could have 5/6 portable USB drives and do your backups ... there...and you won't have the issues and you won't be replacing tapes every ... According to microsoft they know about it and it shouldn't affect the ... continue with the backup. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)