9131-52A disk configuration
- From: Mark Schlechte <mschlechte@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 15:54:15 -0600
For reasons I don't want to get into I'm looking to load up a 9131-52A server with 'internal storage' and I'm having a bit of a struggle getting my RAID options figured out.
From the p520 Tech Overview document it says:The p5-520 and p5-520Q can be configured with the optional SCSI RAID daughter card
(FC 1907) that plugs directly on the system board or with a Dual Channel Ultra320 SCSI
RAID adapter (FC 1913) to drive one 4-pack disk enclosure.
RAID implementation requires a minimum of three disk drives to form a RAID set.
These are different internal RAID options that you can consider:
- Install FC 1907 and up to 4 disk drives in the default 4-pack disk enclosure. This allows
RAID capabilities within a single 4-pack.
- Install FC 1907 and a second 4-pack disk enclosure (FC 6574). This allows RAID
capabilities across two 4-packs.
- Install FC 1907 (or later) and the Ultra320 SCSI 4-Pack Enclosure for Disk Mirroring
(FC 6594). Install the PCI-X Dual Channel Ultra320 SCSI RAID adapter (FC 1913) and
the SCSI cable (FC 4267), which connects the PCI-X adapter to the optional 4-pack disk
enclosure. This RAID configuration provides increased reliability over first and second
options
I plan on putting 8 internal disks in this server I want to take advantage of the 1913's large fast-write cache but I'm not sure how this server should be configured exactly. I think it means the 1907 RAID enablement card would drive one 4-pack and the 1913 would be able drive the 2nd 4-pack.
Correct?
Mark
<html><body><font face = "arial" size = "1">
DISCLAIMER: The information transmitted is intended only
for the addressee and may contain confidential,
proprietary and/or privileged material. Any
unauthorized review, distribution or other use
of or the taking of any action in reliance upon
this information is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and
delete or destroy this message and any copies.
</font><body></html>
- References:
- Striping on striping - good, bad, indifferent?
- From: Roger Deschner
- Re: Striping on striping - good, bad, indifferent?
- From: Vincent D'Antonio
- Re: Striping on striping - good, bad, indifferent?
- From: Rob Forkner
- Re: Striping on striping - good, bad, indifferent?
- From: Davignon, Edward
- Striping on striping - good, bad, indifferent?
- Prev by Date: Re: Striping on striping - good, bad, indifferent?
- Next by Date: rsh messages and wtmp
- Previous by thread: Re: Striping on striping - good, bad, indifferent?
- Next by thread: Re: Striping on striping - good, bad, indifferent?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|