Re: sendfile(2) SF_NOPUSH flag proposal
From: Christoph Hellwig (hch_at_infradead.org)
Date: 05/30/03
- Previous message: Terry Lambert: "Re: sendfile(2) SF_NOPUSH flag proposal"
- In reply to: Terry Lambert: "Re: sendfile(2) SF_NOPUSH flag proposal"
- Next in thread: Igor Sysoev: "Re: sendfile(2) SF_NOPUSH flag proposal"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 10:59:55 +0100 To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 02:53:26AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> This illustrates my thesis that interfaces with the same names
> tend to converge over time. Another example is select(), which
> Linux initially implemented as updating the timeout struct with
> the time which had elapsed; this was divergents, and broke a
> lot of code, until they relented and fixed it to defacto standard
It hasn't changed. And trying to change it broke perfectly working
code.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Terry Lambert: "Re: sendfile(2) SF_NOPUSH flag proposal"
- In reply to: Terry Lambert: "Re: sendfile(2) SF_NOPUSH flag proposal"
- Next in thread: Igor Sysoev: "Re: sendfile(2) SF_NOPUSH flag proposal"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]