Re: API change for bus_dma
From: Justin T. Gibbs (gibbs_at_scsiguy.com)
Date: 06/28/03
- Previous message: Andrew Gallatin: "Re: API change for bus_dma"
- In reply to: Andrew Gallatin: "Re: API change for bus_dma"
- Next in thread: Andrew Gallatin: "Re: API change for bus_dma"
- Reply: Andrew Gallatin: "Re: API change for bus_dma"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 16:32:07 -0600 To: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>, Scott Long <scott_long@btc.adaptec.com>
> > As I understand it, it is possible to set the pycho bridge to use
> > a coherent address range, but FreeBSD doesn't take advantage of that
> > yet.
> >
>
> Yes, that's what solaris does..
We added BUS_DMA_COHERENT to the API just before shipping 5.1. It
is only a "hint", so if you need to verify that the implementation
was able to give you coherent memory, we should add an API to allow
you to know. Of course, the Sparc bus dma implementation doesn't honor
the flag yet, but I'm sure that will change shortly.
-- Justin _______________________________________________ freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Andrew Gallatin: "Re: API change for bus_dma"
- In reply to: Andrew Gallatin: "Re: API change for bus_dma"
- Next in thread: Andrew Gallatin: "Re: API change for bus_dma"
- Reply: Andrew Gallatin: "Re: API change for bus_dma"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|