Re: Jailed sysvipc implementation.
From: Max Khon (fjoe_at_iclub.nsu.ru)
Date: 06/28/03
- Previous message: Terry Lambert: "Re: API change for bus_dma"
- In reply to: Julian Elischer: "Re: Jailed sysvipc implementation."
- Next in thread: Robert Watson: "Re: Jailed sysvipc implementation."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 14:54:12 +0700 To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
hi, there!
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 04:24:29PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > btw I know of two projects whose goal is IP stack virtualization for jail.
> > Virtual IP stack (as well as virtualized sysvipc with separate
> > memory zones) can be quite useful. Can provide two solutions?
> >
> > - with shared memory zone (for those who want "light" version)
> > - with separate memory zones (for people who want to keep
> > sysvipc fully separated, i.e. one user can't exhaust all sysvipc resources
> > and make sysvipc unusable for second user)
>
> Is either of these projects Marco Zec's project?
yes. The other is Riccardo Scandariato work. Both were discussed on -net
about a month ago.
/fjoe
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Terry Lambert: "Re: API change for bus_dma"
- In reply to: Julian Elischer: "Re: Jailed sysvipc implementation."
- Next in thread: Robert Watson: "Re: Jailed sysvipc implementation."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
