Re: RCng -- INFO: X depends on Y, which will be forced to start.
From: Mike Makonnen (mtm_at_identd.net)
Date: 08/21/03
- Previous message: Bruce M Simpson: "Re: RCng -- INFO: X depends on Y, which will be forced to start."
- In reply to: Bruce M Simpson: "Re: RCng -- INFO: X depends on Y, which will be forced to start."
- Next in thread: David O'Brien: "Re: RCng -- INFO: X depends on Y, which will be forced to start."
- Reply: David O'Brien: "Re: RCng -- INFO: X depends on Y, which will be forced to start."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 12:59:06 -0400 To: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org>
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 05:37:49PM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 09:11:14AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> > What do people think? Can we loose these type of warnings? I'm not sure
> > what their need is. The beauty of RCng is that I can say I want Amd (for
> <snip>
>
> I agree with you, but perhaps the warnings should be preserved elsewhere?
> Or toggleable via an rc.conf switch?
I already took care of this a couple of days ago.
Cheers.
-- Mike Makonnen | GPG-KEY: http://www.identd.net/~mtm/mtm.asc mtm@identd.net | Fingerprint: 00E8 61BC 0D75 7FFB E4D3 6BF1 B239 D010 3215 D418 mtm@FreeBSD.Org| FreeBSD - Unleash the Daemon ! _______________________________________________ freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Bruce M Simpson: "Re: RCng -- INFO: X depends on Y, which will be forced to start."
- In reply to: Bruce M Simpson: "Re: RCng -- INFO: X depends on Y, which will be forced to start."
- Next in thread: David O'Brien: "Re: RCng -- INFO: X depends on Y, which will be forced to start."
- Reply: David O'Brien: "Re: RCng -- INFO: X depends on Y, which will be forced to start."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
