Re: RCng -- INFO: X depends on Y, which will be forced to start.
From: David O'Brien (obrien_at_FreeBSD.org)
Date: 08/22/03
- Previous message: Mike Makonnen: "Re: RCng -- INFO: X depends on Y, which will be forced to start."
- In reply to: Mike Makonnen: "Re: RCng -- INFO: X depends on Y, which will be forced to start."
- Next in thread: Peter Wemm: "Re: RCng -- INFO: X depends on Y, which will be forced to start."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 09:47:34 -0700 To: Mike Makonnen <mtm@identd.net>
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:59:06PM -0400, Mike Makonnen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 05:37:49PM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 09:11:14AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> > > What do people think? Can we loose these type of warnings? I'm not sure
> > > what their need is. The beauty of RCng is that I can say I want Amd (for
> > <snip>
> >
> > I agree with you, but perhaps the warnings should be preserved elsewhere?
> > Or toggleable via an rc.conf switch?
>
> I already took care of this a couple of days ago.
thanks!
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Mike Makonnen: "Re: RCng -- INFO: X depends on Y, which will be forced to start."
- In reply to: Mike Makonnen: "Re: RCng -- INFO: X depends on Y, which will be forced to start."
- Next in thread: Peter Wemm: "Re: RCng -- INFO: X depends on Y, which will be forced to start."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
