Re: When to burn those bridges

From: M. Warner Losh (imp_at_bsdimp.com)
Date: 09/10/03

  • Next message: John Baldwin: "RE: When to burn those bridges"
    Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 09:31:34 -0600 (MDT)
    To: dfr@nlsystems.com
    
    

    In message: <1063181264.43759.6.camel@herring.nlsystems.com>
                Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> writes:
    : On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 02:03, M. Warner Losh wrote:
    : > If there's a really compelling reason (and this would be it), we can
    : > burn some bridges early. I wouldn't hold up your development based on
    : > these bridges being in harm's way. Others in the BSDcon terminal room
    : > are saying "do it now, screw waiting for 6". If you can get it done
    : > and solid, I'd do it before the branch. The drivers in harm's way
    : > either have out of tree replacements, or aren't that important, or
    : > need to be redone and this is a good excuse.
    :
    : If I commit this work to -current now, it will break ABI compatibility
    : with 5.1-RELEASE. When is the ABI for 5.x suppose to be frozen? Does it
    : matter if I break the 5.1 ABI in current? For what its worth, this
    : change will also make the kobj method dispatch SMP safe (without locks).

    We can still break ABI with 5.1 if there's a good reason. Making
    things MP stafe is a good reason.

    : > : The same technique could be used to reduce the number of 'converter'
    : > : devices.
    : >
    : > I like this. pcic/cbb have similar issues, but the size of the
    : > problem is small.
    :
    : Its mainly a cosmetic thing but it has always been an irritation to me
    : to have these little clusters of devices where there is only one piece
    : of hardware, e.g.:
    :
    : hostb0
    : pci0
    : pcib1
    : pci1
    : amdpm0
    : smbus0
    : smb0
    :
    : should become:
    :
    : pci0
    : pci1
    : amdpm0

    Actually, the bridges do add value, so at least pcib would need to
    remain. I think it would be hard to get rid of them, but there could
    easily be something that I'm missing.

    Warner
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: John Baldwin: "RE: When to burn those bridges"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Oxford Canal Bridges
      ... Basingstoke canal, due to thye poor state of the gates on Lock 3, ... I think you will find that all the bridges in sad state of repair (the ... thus 'health and safety' could be a reason to ...
      (uk.rec.waterways)
    • Re: understanding car amplifiers and bridging
      ... would *not* use bridges is if they want to use a chassis ground ... I imagine there may be exceptions, but the car radios I've looked ... there's far less reason to dedicate a connector pin to it. ...
      (sci.electronics.basics)
    • Re: Code review request
      ... M. Warner Losh wrote: ... removes the obsolete support for other systems in if_spppsubr.c. ... there a reason I shouldn't commit this? ...
      (freebsd-net)
    • Re: EVA FILM
      ... The reason why Bridges of Madison County was popular is named Oprah. ...
      (rec.arts.anime.misc)
    • Re: Ziatech 5503 watchdog driver
      ... On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 09:25, Warner Losh wrote: ... > That's not a good enough reason to make it an option, ... Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer ... for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au ...
      (freebsd-hackers)