Re: adding if_dev member to struct ifnet
From: Brooks Davis (brooks_at_one-eyed-alien.net)
Date: 10/01/03
- Next in thread: Harti Brandt: "Re: adding if_dev member to struct ifnet"
- Maybe reply: Harti Brandt: "Re: adding if_dev member to struct ifnet"
- Maybe reply: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: adding if_dev member to struct ifnet"
- Maybe reply: Daniel C. Sobral: "Re: adding if_dev member to struct ifnet"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:58:37 -0700 To: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>
Since there are some objections to this proposal, I have an alternative
one for consideration. I would add two new members to ifnet, if_dname
and if_dunit, containing the driver name and unit which would be similar
to the current if_name and if_unit with the exception that if_dunit
would be an int to match unit in device_t. Negative values of unit
would mean "no unit" for pseudo devices where units don't really make
sense.
Because this would add annoying overhead to the init routine, I would
also propose adding an if_initname() function that would hide the
initialization of these variables and (if MFC'd) aid portability
between 4 and 5.
Is this a better or worse idea then adding if_dev?
-- Brooks
-- Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Next in thread: Harti Brandt: "Re: adding if_dev member to struct ifnet"
- Maybe reply: Harti Brandt: "Re: adding if_dev member to struct ifnet"
- Maybe reply: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: adding if_dev member to struct ifnet"
- Maybe reply: Daniel C. Sobral: "Re: adding if_dev member to struct ifnet"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|