Re: HEADSUP: New i386 interrupt and SMP code..
From: David O'Brien (obrien_at_FreeBSD.org)
Date: 10/31/03
- Previous message: Bruce M Simpson: "Re: HEADSUP: New i386 interrupt and SMP code.."
- In reply to: John Baldwin: "HEADSUP: New i386 interrupt and SMP code.."
- Next in thread: John Baldwin: "Re: HEADSUP: New i386 interrupt and SMP code.."
- Reply: John Baldwin: "Re: HEADSUP: New i386 interrupt and SMP code.."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 17:16:59 -0800 To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 05:34:47PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> Downsides:
> - ACPI will no longer work as a module for know. The reason
> for this is that ACPI's APIC enumerator needs to be able
> to hook into a SI_SUB_TUNABLES - 1 SYSINIT() due to existing
> code that wants to know the available CPUs in the system
> very early (specifically, UMA).
How will one not have to deal with fscked-up AML BIOS code, when one
wants to use MADT rather than mptable's to use the APIC?
I.E., the ACPI-AML bits should be seperatable from the ACPI-MADT bits.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Bruce M Simpson: "Re: HEADSUP: New i386 interrupt and SMP code.."
- In reply to: John Baldwin: "HEADSUP: New i386 interrupt and SMP code.."
- Next in thread: John Baldwin: "Re: HEADSUP: New i386 interrupt and SMP code.."
- Reply: John Baldwin: "Re: HEADSUP: New i386 interrupt and SMP code.."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]