Re: New newfs vs. half-baked disks patch
From: Bruce Evans (bde_at_zeta.org.au)
Date: 11/12/03
- Previous message: Alexander Leidinger: "Re: Patches to compile the kernel with Intel's C/C++ compiler"
- In reply to: Wes Peters: "New newfs vs. half-baked disks patch"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 11:10:27 +1100 (EST) To: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Wes Peters wrote:
> I re-did the patch using a differing magic number, as suggested. This
> approach works quite nicely. The patch is smaller and does more with
> no kernel mods.
Thanks for listening to me :-).
> This patch includes a change to fsck so it will recognize an incomplete
> newfs filesystem, exiting with a unique status (11) and issuing the
> message "This volume is incomplete, run newfs again."
No comma splices please.
> The patch to newfs includes the -E flag to generate error conditions;
> these changes will be committed separately. Barring lack of
> objections, I'd like to commit this tomorrow.
Detailed comments in private mail.
Bruce
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Alexander Leidinger: "Re: Patches to compile the kernel with Intel's C/C++ compiler"
- In reply to: Wes Peters: "New newfs vs. half-baked disks patch"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|