Re: Patches to compile the kernel with Intel's C/C++ compiler
From: Alp ATICI (atici_at_myrealbox.com)
Date: 11/12/03
- Previous message: Bruce Evans: "Re: New newfs vs. half-baked disks patch"
- Maybe in reply to: Alexander Leidinger: "Patches to compile the kernel with Intel's C/C++ compiler"
- Next in thread: Alexander Leidinger: "Re: Patches to compile the kernel with Intel's C/C++ compiler"
- Reply: Alexander Leidinger: "Re: Patches to compile the kernel with Intel's C/C++ compiler"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: arch@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 19:31:30 -0500
> What are the benefits of running an icc compiled kernel?
The main reason for icc development is to support IA-64 because EPIC architecture is very demanding on the compiler side. That's why the real benefit should be apparent with an IA-64 computer eventually.
Does this patch work for IA-64?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Bruce Evans: "Re: New newfs vs. half-baked disks patch"
- Maybe in reply to: Alexander Leidinger: "Patches to compile the kernel with Intel's C/C++ compiler"
- Next in thread: Alexander Leidinger: "Re: Patches to compile the kernel with Intel's C/C++ compiler"
- Reply: Alexander Leidinger: "Re: Patches to compile the kernel with Intel's C/C++ compiler"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]