Re: newfs and mount vs. half-baked disks
From: Poul-Henning Kamp (phk_at_phk.freebsd.dk)
Date: 11/12/03
- Previous message: Alp ATICI: "Re: Patches to compile the kernel with Intel's C/C++ compiler"
- In reply to: Bruce Evans: "Re: newfs and mount vs. half-baked disks"
- Next in thread: Peter Jeremy: "Re: newfs and mount vs. half-baked disks"
- Reply: Peter Jeremy: "Re: newfs and mount vs. half-baked disks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 09:56:14 +0100
In message <20031108191433.J608@gamplex.bde.org>, Bruce Evans writes:
>I don't use GEOM, so the label won't be going away for me. Anyway, there
>is no dependency (the label is just one of the things that one might
>examine to recover a crashed disk), and any overaul by GEOM would have
>to duplicate the functionality of storing metadata about the superblocks
>somewhere outside the superblocks.
This is a very good example of where it is important to get your
terminology straight: No sane "overhaul by GEOM" would implement
this in GEOM. It could be hacked into various existing classes or
even done cleanly in its own class which is almost as silly.
> (I actually store metadata about file
>systems in (backups of) disk files in /var/backups. Normal backups
>provide inadequate backups of metadata.)
This is probably a much better idea than anything you said until now
on the subject.
It might not be a bad idea to store the relevant magics in a
/etc/ufs.conf file, but there are some details about device vs.
media/filesystem identification in particular in context of dynanic
devices to that must be worked out.
-- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Alp ATICI: "Re: Patches to compile the kernel with Intel's C/C++ compiler"
- In reply to: Bruce Evans: "Re: newfs and mount vs. half-baked disks"
- Next in thread: Peter Jeremy: "Re: newfs and mount vs. half-baked disks"
- Reply: Peter Jeremy: "Re: newfs and mount vs. half-baked disks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]