Re: newfs and mount vs. half-baked disks
From: Peter Jeremy (PeterJeremy_at_optushome.com.au)
Date: 11/13/03
- Previous message: Alexander Leidinger: "Re: Patches to compile the kernel with Intel's C/C++ compiler"
- In reply to: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: newfs and mount vs. half-baked disks"
- Next in thread: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: newfs and mount vs. half-baked disks"
- Reply: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: newfs and mount vs. half-baked disks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 17:42:51 +1100 To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 09:56:14AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>It might not be a bad idea to store the relevant magics in a
>/etc/ufs.conf file, but there are some details about device vs.
>media/filesystem identification in particular in context of dynanic
>devices to that must be worked out.
How do you handle the situation when the master superblock on / is
hosed and you need to find the filesystem parameters (in
/etc/ufs.conf) before you can access /?
If the BSD-style disklabels are going away, at least the root
parameters need to be in the boot blocks or somewhere similar.
Peter
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Alexander Leidinger: "Re: Patches to compile the kernel with Intel's C/C++ compiler"
- In reply to: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: newfs and mount vs. half-baked disks"
- Next in thread: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: newfs and mount vs. half-baked disks"
- Reply: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: newfs and mount vs. half-baked disks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]