Re: 64-bit time_t on sparc64, epilogue(?)
From: Garance A Drosihn (drosih_at_rpi.edu)
Date: 11/16/03
- Previous message: Wes Peters: "Re: 64-bit time_t on sparc64, epilogue(?)"
- In reply to: Wes Peters: "Re: 64-bit time_t on sparc64, epilogue(?)"
- Next in thread: Doug White: "Re: 64-bit time_t on sparc64, epilogue(?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 02:41:35 -0500 To: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>, Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org>
At 10:32 PM -0800 11/15/03, Wes Peters wrote:
>
>... and pushed back the -STABLE timeline to 5.3. So you've
>been given a reprieve. And just think of all that testing
>time you'll have over the holidays to make sure it's really
>really right. ;^)
Okay, I'll get right on it! :-)
(well, maybe not until next weekend...)
-- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu _______________________________________________ freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Wes Peters: "Re: 64-bit time_t on sparc64, epilogue(?)"
- In reply to: Wes Peters: "Re: 64-bit time_t on sparc64, epilogue(?)"
- Next in thread: Doug White: "Re: 64-bit time_t on sparc64, epilogue(?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]