Re: Request for Comments: libarchive, bsdtar
From: Vladimir Dozen (vladimir-dozen_at_mail.ru)
Date: 01/15/04
- Previous message: Tim Kientzle: "Re: Request for Comments: libarchive, bsdtar"
- In reply to: Tim Kientzle: "Re: Request for Comments: libarchive, bsdtar"
- Next in thread: Tim Kientzle: "Re: Request for Comments: libarchive, bsdtar"
- Reply: Tim Kientzle: "Re: Request for Comments: libarchive, bsdtar"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:28:04 -0500 To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
ehlo.
> so I want to make sure it's well-tested
BTW, how do you perform testing of the library/tar?
This kind of code should (shall) contain almost
100% automated test coverage, in my opinion. It's due to
it's complexity and extremely wide usage.
>> - I would prefer it if compression was done by opening a pipe to
>> gzip/bzip2 instead of using libz/libbz2.
> Not really simpler for the library, and definitely not simpler
> for clients of the library.
Yeah. Spawning a process from inside the library is a bad idea, IMO.
The right way to avoid code duplication between gzip and libarchive
is to use common libgzip. The same applies to bzip and compress.
dozen
http://dozen.ru
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Tim Kientzle: "Re: Request for Comments: libarchive, bsdtar"
- In reply to: Tim Kientzle: "Re: Request for Comments: libarchive, bsdtar"
- Next in thread: Tim Kientzle: "Re: Request for Comments: libarchive, bsdtar"
- Reply: Tim Kientzle: "Re: Request for Comments: libarchive, bsdtar"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|