Re: per-device sysctls
From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav (des_at_des.no)
Date: 02/26/04
- Previous message: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: per-device sysctls"
- In reply to: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: per-device sysctls"
- Next in thread: M. Warner Losh: "Re: per-device sysctls"
- Reply: M. Warner Losh: "Re: per-device sysctls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:47:58 +0100
"Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> writes:
> Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?= writes:
> > "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> writes:
> > > That is a good reason to transitioning to this, so long as we can come
> > > up with a good way to represent detached nodes.
> > As long as they have a device_t, it should be a piece of cake.
> Having a device_t is a property of having hardware, not of being a
> device driver.
I believe that by "detached nodes", Warner means hardware that does
not have a driver.
DES
-- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@des.no _______________________________________________ freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: per-device sysctls"
- In reply to: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: per-device sysctls"
- Next in thread: M. Warner Losh: "Re: per-device sysctls"
- Reply: M. Warner Losh: "Re: per-device sysctls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|