Re: CFD: XMLification of NOTES
From: Alexey Zelkin (phantom_at_FreeBSD.org)
Date: 03/31/04
- Previous message: Robert Watson: "Re: Where should devctl notifications be sent from?"
- In reply to: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: CFD: XMLification of NOTES"
- Next in thread: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: CFD: XMLification of NOTES"
- Reply: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: CFD: XMLification of NOTES"
- Reply: Peter Wemm: "Re: CFD: XMLification of NOTES"
- Reply: Peter Wemm: "Re: CFD: XMLification of NOTES"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 02:24:29 +0300 To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no>
hi,
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 05:05:24PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> Alexey Zelkin <phantom@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> > This weekend I have got some spare time (due to illness) and in
> > order to get some rest from current tasks decided to pass thru old
> > TODO file. Most interesting task got my attention was old item
> > related to XMLification NOTES.
> >
> > Important advantage of this step (IMO) is to provide possibility to
> > check dependency/conflicts of kernel configuration file to end users.
> > [...]
>
> NOTES is not intended as a list of supported device and options. We
> have src/sys/conf/files* and src/sys/conf/options* for that.
Strange. IMO LINT was existed for exactly this reason (plus meta-kernel
configuration file used for compiling checks). LINT and NOTES aren't
so different, so you can't say that purpose of NOTES is different than
LINT.
> Dependencies between loadable drivers and subsystems are documented in
> the source code (MODULE_DEPEND), though that information is not used
> at compile time. Dependencies that involve non-loadable drivers and
> subsystems are not documented anywhere (except sometimes in manual
> pages). It would not be hard to modify config(8) to obtain that
> information from e.g. src/sys/conf/depend*. I might even come up with
> a patch if I'm bored.
I am not asking for patches, but if you would provide me general
description how to realize that CPU_I386 conflicts with SMP and
ADAPTIVE_MUTEXES depends on SMP (using your way) I would be happy and
re-think my approach.
-- /* Alexey Zelkin && Independent Contractor */ /* phantom(at)FreeBSD.org && http://www.FreeBSD.org/java */ /* phantom(at)cris.net && http://www.FreeBSD.org.ua/ */ _______________________________________________ freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Robert Watson: "Re: Where should devctl notifications be sent from?"
- In reply to: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: CFD: XMLification of NOTES"
- Next in thread: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: CFD: XMLification of NOTES"
- Reply: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: CFD: XMLification of NOTES"
- Reply: Peter Wemm: "Re: CFD: XMLification of NOTES"
- Reply: Peter Wemm: "Re: CFD: XMLification of NOTES"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]