Re: CFD: XMLification of NOTES

From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav (des_at_des.no)
Date: 03/31/04

  • Next message: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: CFD: XMLification of NOTES" 
    To: Alexey Zelkin <phantom@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 01:54:10 +0200

    Alexey Zelkin <phantom@FreeBSD.org> writes:
    > On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 05:05:24PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
    > > NOTES is not intended as a list of supported device and options. We
    > > have src/sys/conf/files* and src/sys/conf/options* for that.
    > Strange. IMO LINT was existed for exactly this reason

    Your opinion does not matter. The purpose of LINT is to cover as much
    code as possible. Why do you think it's called LINT?

    (hint: man lint)

    > I am not asking for patches, but if you would provide me general
    > description how to realize that CPU_I386 conflicts with SMP and
    > ADAPTIVE_MUTEXES depends on SMP (using your way) I would be happy and
    > re-think my approach.

    CPU_I386 should not conflict with SMP, but a kernel build with both
    will be very slow.

    ADAPTIVE_MUTEXES does not depend on SMP, though it's a no-op unless
    SMP is enabled.

    DES 

    -- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@des.no
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
  • Next message: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: CFD: XMLification of NOTES"