Re: interface renaming of an running interface
From: Robert Watson (rwatson_at_freebsd.org)
Date: 04/07/04
- Previous message: Harti Brandt: "interface renaming of an running interface"
- In reply to: Harti Brandt: "interface renaming of an running interface"
- Next in thread: Harti Brandt: "Re: interface renaming of an running interface"
- Reply: Harti Brandt: "Re: interface renaming of an running interface"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 13:52:17 -0400 (EDT) To: harti@freebsd.org
On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, Harti Brandt wrote:
> I'm currently trying to teach bsnmp to correctly handle interface
> renaming. One problem that I encounter is that a process listening on
> the routing socket sees an interface departure and an interface arrival
> message. This cause interfaces that run stateful protocols like SNMP on
> ATM interfaces to drop all connections which isn't really all that nice.
> The SNMP daemon would also loose all interface state and would report
> the renamed interface as a new interface with a new ifindex. This
> directly violates the IF-MIB RFC, because the daemon is required to
> understand that this is the same interface (the ifindex doesn't really
> help here, because unloading/loading the driver gives the same
> behaviour). I would like to do one of the following two things:
>
> 1) disallow renaming an interface while it is up, or 2) instead of
> emiting a departure/arrival pair of routing messages, generate a rename
> message.
>
> Additionally I would like to create new sysctls:
>
> net.link.generic.ifdata.<ifindex>.dname
> net.link.generic.ifdata.<ifindex>.dunit
>
> to access the driver's name of an interface.
>
> Comments?
I was actually worried about this issue also -- FWIW, the issue already
exists even without generic interface renaming because some interfaces
(specifically, if_sl) already support renumbering on demand using ioctl().
I agree that what we need is a rename event -- the only real question is
whether and how to handle compatibility for applications that don't know
what to do with it. Presumably the only real question is for things like
SNMP and routing daemons, although we've also talked about event
monitoring for interfaces using devctl, in which case devd would need to
learn about the "rename" primitive as well.
Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects
robert@fledge.watson.org Senior Research Scientist, McAfee Research
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Harti Brandt: "interface renaming of an running interface"
- In reply to: Harti Brandt: "interface renaming of an running interface"
- Next in thread: Harti Brandt: "Re: interface renaming of an running interface"
- Reply: Harti Brandt: "Re: interface renaming of an running interface"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
