Re: Digital-tv card drivers and API discussion

Teemu.Parkkinen_at_patria.fi
Date: 04/13/04

  • Next message: Nicholas M Christian: "Platform architecture"
    To: Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.org>
    Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 14:40:21 +0300
    
    

    > > 1) Should we use Linux-DVB API as a reference, or should we consider
    some
    > > changes to it? The API seems to be constantly changing and improving.
    > > Version 3 is available here:
    > > http://www.linuxtv.org/download/dvb/linux-dvb-api-1.0.0.pdf
    > > but they are currently working on version 4. In my opinion, the API
    should
    > > be minimal, but complete, so there is no need to constantly add new
    > > features to it.
    >
    >
    > If the API in your evaluation is reasonably OK, we should stick with it
    > (or a subset of it). Being directly compatible gives a lot of benefits.

    I agree.

    > > In other words, we have to write the driver from scratch. In this case
    > > we don't have to stick with the Linux DVB-API and therefore I suggest
    > > that we give think the api through before deciding how we implement
    > > it (do we follow linux api or not).
    >
    > What issues do you see with the Linux API that would make us want to
    > change it?

    I would prefer not to change it. I think it's quite ok, yet it still
    seems to be evolving a bit. I don't think however, that this is a big
    issue because dvb has been included in 2.6 linux-ernels and therefore I
    doubt that they want to change it much.

    I will take a look on the most current linux api and implement FreeBSD
    driver
    based on that. If you have ideas on this that I should take into account,
    please let me know.

    -Teemu

    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: Nicholas M Christian: "Platform architecture"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Digital-tv card drivers and API discussion
      ... The API seems to be constantly changing and improving. ... We CAN port over drivers, ... What issues do you see with the Linux API that would make us want to ...
      (freebsd-arch)
    • Re: [ANN] Net::LDAP 0.0.4 released
      ... > I'm also excited that you're flexible about the interface; ... which are not exactly easy to use. ... Thanks- improving the API and making it more Ruby-esque was a major ...
      (comp.lang.ruby)
    • Re: Linux compatible setaffinity.
      ... Regardless of which API we choose for FreeBSD applications, ... should also implement the Linux API to simplify the porting of Linux ...
      (freebsd-arch)
    • Re: Determining System Directories ??
      ... > Dim gwdRet As Long ... > 'there is an error using the API call that you must deal with, ... i'm improving this (except for the API ... >> can read to determine the name of the current Windows directory. ...
      (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion)
    • Re: writing to ms word and compatibility
      ... there's actually a very large probability that something in the API ... send your thanks to the Redmond developers who keep ... "improving" the API with each version and assume that everyone will ...
      (comp.soft-sys.matlab)