Re: bin/41071: make NO to NO_ transition patch

From: Ruslan Ermilov (ru_at_FreeBSD.org)
Date: 04/16/04

  • Next message: Bruce Evans: "Re: bin/41071: make NO to NO_ transition patch" 
    Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 22:24:31 +0300
To: Cyrille Lefevre <clefevre-lists@9online.fr>

    On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 05:48:20PM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
    > "Bruce Evans" <bde@zeta.org.au> wrote:
    > > On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
    > >
    > > > anyone interrested to validate and commit this PR ?
    > >
    > > I hope not.
    >
    > I hope yes since this was not the past agreement.
    >
    > http://tinyurl.com/3fraz
    > (http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=177270+0+archive/2002/freebsd-arch
    > /20020609.freebsd-arch)
    >
    >
    > <cite "Mike Barcroft">
    > In the past versions of this conversation, the general agreement is that
    > going forward we should probably standardize on underscores to seperate
    > words. So, NO_FOO rather than NOFOO. However, no_volunteer has come
    > forward to do the work you've described, so if you're volunteering....
    > </cite>
    >
    > I'd volunteer w/ "Ruslan Ermilov" and even do the job.
    >
    Well, it's been a while. ;-)

    I'm fine with doing it before we branch RELENG_5, and burning bridges the
    day we branch RELENG_6. Let's wait for some more feedback on arch@ though.
    If that doesn't work, I will talk to re@. It's also safe since we stay
    backwards compatible. Nice stuff!

    Cheers, 

    -- 
Ruslan Ermilov
ru@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer

  • Next message: Bruce Evans: "Re: bin/41071: make NO to NO_ transition patch"