Re: newbus flaw
From: Poul-Henning Kamp (phk_at_phk.freebsd.dk)
Date: 05/11/04
- Previous message: Doug Rabson: "Re: newbus flaw"
- In reply to: Doug Rabson: "Re: newbus flaw"
- Next in thread: John-Mark Gurney: "Re: newbus flaw"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 17:12:54 +0200
In message <1084288070.13434.26.camel@builder02.qubesoft.com>, Doug Rabson writ
es:
>This is a known problem. The 'right' solution is to add a new static
>method to the device interface which is the opposite of IDENTIFY (e.g.
>UNIDENTIFY). One way to get around the problem is to do something like:
That word should be dragged behind the first convenient tree and stabbed
to death.
The opposite of IDENTIFY would be OBSCURE, but I supposed in this case
that FORGET would be appropriate.
-- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Doug Rabson: "Re: newbus flaw"
- In reply to: Doug Rabson: "Re: newbus flaw"
- Next in thread: John-Mark Gurney: "Re: newbus flaw"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]