Re: Move /usr/sup to /var/db/sup?

From: Garance A Drosihn (drosih_at_rpi.edu)
Date: 05/21/04

  • Next message: Crist J. Clark: "Re: Move /usr/sup to /var/db/sup?"
    Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 17:38:56 -0400
    To: "Crist J. Clark" <cjc@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
    
    

    At 12:36 PM -0700 5/21/04, Crist J. Clark wrote:
    >Just a minor thing, but I would think[0] most people would
    >agree that /var/db/sup is a much more logical place for the
    >CVSup "base" directory than /usr/sup. Yes, it doesn't take
    >up much space on /usr, but for those who don't want to write
    >to /usr[1] too much or mount /usr read-only, it's an irritant.
    >
    >Of course, there is one big reason not to change it, because
    >it would be a change.

    I have all my own sup-files anyway, so I do not have any
    strong opinion on this. But there is one minor advantage
    that I have noticed in having the "base=" directory in the
    same partition as the "prefix=" directory. If the partition
    matching "prefix=" is not mounted, and if the "base=" file
    is on that partition, then any attempt to run the cvsup will
    immediately fail.

    However, if the "prefix=" partition is not mounted, and the
    "base=" directory *is* available (because it is on a different
    partition), then the cvsup will go right ahead and download
    everything into the wrong partition. Depending on how your
    machine is set up, this can be rather disastrous... (it was
    for me, at least!)

    I have no idea if that is why someone went with /usr/sup in
    the example supfiles, though. I do not object to making the
    change to use /var/db/sup, but then I don't use those example
    files so my vote wouldn't mean much anyway... :-)

    -- 
    Garance Alistair Drosehn            =   gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu
    Senior Systems Programmer           or  gad@freebsd.org
    Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute    or  drosih@rpi.edu
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    

  • Next message: Crist J. Clark: "Re: Move /usr/sup to /var/db/sup?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Exporting which partitions to md-configure
      ... partition table you could look for something like 'Linux_RAID' or similar (just arbitrarily define some name beginning with the Linux_ prefix), ... This means that the partition table type would need to be exposed as well. ... To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: Suse 9.1 Pro fails to boot
      ... that should be kernel /boot/vmlinuz .... ... If you always put the /boot prefix, then it doesn't matter whether /boot ... is a separate partition or not. ...
      (alt.os.linux.suse)
    • Re: Lockup during boot
      ... > cvsup of 5.2-CURRENT from this morning. ... I have completed the buildworld, ... > partition which I have been using since sometime back in the days of 2.x ... > piped to the serial ports so I suppose it could be going to serial console ...
      (freebsd-current)
    • Re: Can WinXP Pro format a 160 G Partition with Fat32 correctly?
      ... "Clark" wrote in message ... > Most Bios can handle the larger drives, if not an update probably will. ... > WinXP can handle a 160 G partition using NTFS file system. ... can WinXP correctly format a 160 G partition using Fat 32 ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics)