Re: Network Stack Locking
From: Bruce M Simpson (bms_at_spc.org)
Date: 05/24/04
- Previous message: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "'-h'/'-H' functionality."
- In reply to: Harti Brandt: "Re: Network Stack Locking"
- Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Network Stack Locking"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 16:33:46 +0100 To: Harti Brandt <harti@freebsd.org>
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 11:08:13AM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote:
> RW>- ATM -- Harti? :-)
>
> Sure. At least netnatm, netgraph/atm and the various drivers. At one
> point I want to get rid of netatm, so I don't want to put effort into
> netatm (just keep it working and compliling).
I second this. HATM has had its time, NATM is the way to go; it's much
more flexible.
Regards,
BMS
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "'-h'/'-H' functionality."
- In reply to: Harti Brandt: "Re: Network Stack Locking"
- Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Network Stack Locking"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]