Re: Network Stack Locking
From: Luigi Rizzo (rizzo_at_icir.org)
Date: 05/25/04
- Previous message: Matthew Dillon: "Re: Network Stack Locking"
- In reply to: Matthew Dillon: "Re: Network Stack Locking"
- Next in thread: Robert Watson: "Re: Network Stack Locking"
- Reply: Robert Watson: "Re: Network Stack Locking"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 11:32:08 -0700 To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 11:20:49AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
...
> :Actually, this was the specific point I was making also :-). The question
> :I was asking was about the depth of the message queues between protocol
> :stack layers in actual measurements -- are you observing substantial
> :coallescing between layers as a result of the queues at this point? I'm
...
> It should also be noted that since today's processors are so damn fast,
> actually maxing out the cpu before maxing out the PCI bus(es), at least
> on a standard workstation, is difficult.
that's where the soekris comes handy :)
(yes i understand that much of the issues here are related to SMP,
but there lot of evidence that a non-smp 5.x kernel is significantly
slower than the equivalent 4.x code, even on heavy network i/o
loads, so there is certainly something to clean up there too).
cheers
luigi
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Matthew Dillon: "Re: Network Stack Locking"
- In reply to: Matthew Dillon: "Re: Network Stack Locking"
- Next in thread: Robert Watson: "Re: Network Stack Locking"
- Reply: Robert Watson: "Re: Network Stack Locking"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|