Re: dev_t / udev_t confusion ?
From: Peter Wemm (peter_at_wemm.org)
Date: 06/10/04
- Previous message: Garance A Drosihn: "Re: Change to "kludge option processing" in /bin/ps"
- In reply to: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: dev_t / udev_t confusion ?"
- Next in thread: Bruce Evans: "Re: dev_t / udev_t confusion ?"
- Reply: Bruce Evans: "Re: dev_t / udev_t confusion ?"
- Reply: Bruce Evans: "Re: dev_t / udev_t confusion ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 16:37:00 -0700
On Wednesday 09 June 2004 08:55 am, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <53993.1086779790@critter.freebsd.dk>, Poul-Henning Kamp
writes:
> >The change proposed is more or less to do:
> > s/dev_t/struct cdev */
> > s/udev_t/dev_t/
> >over all the kernel sources (366 files or so).
>
> Looks like a "yea" so far, so I have a couple of follow-up questions:
I had a slight preference for 'kdev_t *' in the kernel, but 'struct cdev
*' works for me as well so I've changed my mind. No objection from me
then.
> struct cdev currently has members named si_* because it
> used to be called "specinfo", do we want to change that
> inconsistency at the same time ? (either by reverting to
> the specinfo name or by changing to a cd_ prefix ?
Whatever works.
> cdevsw->ioctl() takes a caddr_t pointer argument which
> really should be a void *, do we want to change that
> as well (since it is all the same files we'll have to
> change).
Yes from me.
-- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 _______________________________________________ freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Garance A Drosihn: "Re: Change to "kludge option processing" in /bin/ps"
- In reply to: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: dev_t / udev_t confusion ?"
- Next in thread: Bruce Evans: "Re: dev_t / udev_t confusion ?"
- Reply: Bruce Evans: "Re: dev_t / udev_t confusion ?"
- Reply: Bruce Evans: "Re: dev_t / udev_t confusion ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|