Re: Confusion about process states and invariants

From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav (des_at_des.no)
Date: 06/27/04

  • Next message: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Re: Confusion about process states and invariants" 
    To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:51:43 +0200

    Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> writes:
    > FYI, two of the reported problems were in sysctl_kern_proc() and
    > linprocfs.

    pseudofs, not linprocfs.

    > One of those has been patched by checking p_ucred for NULL;
    > the other has not.

    No. The proposed patch for sysctl_kern_proc() wouldn't have worked,
    and I would have backed it out if it had been committed.

    DES 

    -- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@des.no
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
  • Next message: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Re: Confusion about process states and invariants"