Re: some PRs
From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek (pjd_at_FreeBSD.org)
Date: 07/18/04
- Previous message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: some PRs"
- In reply to: Robert Millan: "Re: some PRs"
- Next in thread: M. Warner Losh: "Re: some PRs"
- Reply: M. Warner Losh: "Re: some PRs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 20:40:08 +0200 To: Robert Millan <zeratul2@wanadoo.es>
On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 06:51:42PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
+> I don't claim that /dev/full is useful just for the sake of it. Your argument
+> (that having a device just for each errno value is silly) is something I
+> basicaly agree with.
Even if it is used by some programms, I don't see it in the base system.
It can be always implemented as a kernel module and maintained outside
the tree.
-- Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.FreeBSD.org pjd@FreeBSD.org http://garage.freebsd.pl FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: some PRs"
- In reply to: Robert Millan: "Re: some PRs"
- Next in thread: M. Warner Losh: "Re: some PRs"
- Reply: M. Warner Losh: "Re: some PRs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|