Re: some PRs
From: M. Warner Losh (imp_at_bsdimp.com)
Date: 07/19/04
- Previous message: m.autoreply_at_ieee.org: "(no subject)"
- In reply to: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Re: some PRs"
- Next in thread: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Re: some PRs"
- Reply: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Re: some PRs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 00:58:25 -0600 (MDT) To: pjd@freebsd.org
In message: <20040718184008.GC57678@darkness.comp.waw.pl>
Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@freebsd.org> writes:
: On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 06:51:42PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
: +> I don't claim that /dev/full is useful just for the sake of it. Your argument
: +> (that having a device just for each errno value is silly) is something I
: +> basicaly agree with.
:
: Even if it is used by some programms, I don't see it in the base system.
: It can be always implemented as a kernel module and maintained outside
: the tree.
Given that it is implemented in this driver in about 20 lines, I think
that it makes sense to have it in the base. Suggesting it be
maintained outside of the tree is just plain silly. It should be
brought in or abadoned.
Warner
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: m.autoreply_at_ieee.org: "(no subject)"
- In reply to: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Re: some PRs"
- Next in thread: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Re: some PRs"
- Reply: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Re: some PRs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|