Re: kldunload DIAGNOSTIC idea...
From: M. Warner Losh (imp_at_bsdimp.com)
Date: 07/21/04
- Previous message: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: kldunload DIAGNOSTIC idea..."
- In reply to: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: kldunload DIAGNOSTIC idea..."
- Next in thread: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: kldunload DIAGNOSTIC idea..."
- Reply: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: kldunload DIAGNOSTIC idea..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 11:10:45 -0600 (MDT) To: phk@phk.freebsd.dk
In message: <84655.1090427927@critter.freebsd.dk>
"Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> writes:
: In message <20040721.084926.84362543.imp@bsdimp.com>, "M. Warner Losh" writes:
: >[[ only cc'd arch@ ]]
: >
: >In message: <83182.1090412961@critter.freebsd.dk>
: > "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> writes:
: >: >Any ideas on how network interfaces should
: >: >work in this?
: >:
: >: I talked with Robert briefly about this yesterday, and the problem
: >: there is that struct ifnet is embedded in the softc. If the softc
: >: had a pointer to the ifnet, then we could do something similar, but
: >: as long as it's embedded we're stuck.
: >
: >Why is that the case? We don't detach the ifnet stuff after deleting
: >the softc. Why would a pointer to ifnet in the softc make this
: >easier?
:
: Because it would allow the softc could be freed before the ifnet
: structure.
But the ifnet structure has a back pointer to the softc. What would
this accomplish?
struct ifnet {
void *if_softc; /* pointer to driver state */
so you'd have to zero this out, and then change all the places that
dereference this to check for NULL. :-(
: >I mean, I understand that having a pointer would insulate the size of
: >ifnet from the driver, but there's so many offsets in ifnet that are
: >encoded in the driver that doesn't seem that big a win.
:
: That's not the point here. The problem here is that we cannot unload
: the driver until we have hunted down and exterminated all references
: to the ifnet structure.
We can't unload the driver until we've exterminated all references to
softc too.
: If softc only pointed to the ifnet, we could neuter the ifnet (like
: we do for cdev and vnodes with a set of dead_* functions) wait for
: all threads to drain out of the module and unload it. The ifnet
: cleanup will happen "when convenient".
We still ahve to wait for all threads with references to softc to
drain out before we unload the module. I see a small benefit to that,
but it seems that the requirements for softc are stronger than ifnet
and already cover it. The detach routine of the driver could easily
wait for the ifnet reference count to drop before returning for
network drivers (heck the if_detach call could wait all references are
gone, so that it isn't actually in the driver). Where it is stored
seems not to matter so much.
Warner
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: kldunload DIAGNOSTIC idea..."
- In reply to: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: kldunload DIAGNOSTIC idea..."
- Next in thread: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: kldunload DIAGNOSTIC idea..."
- Reply: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: kldunload DIAGNOSTIC idea..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
- Re: kldunload DIAGNOSTIC idea...
... there is that struct ifnet is embedded in the softc. ... Why would a
pointer to ifnet in the softc make this ... encoded in the driver that doesn't seem
that big a win. ... (freebsd-arch) - Re: kldunload DIAGNOSTIC idea...
... there is that struct ifnet is embedded in the softc. ... Why would a
pointer to ifnet in the softc make this ... >encoded in the driver that doesn't
seem that big a win. ... (freebsd-arch) - Re: kldunload DIAGNOSTIC idea...
... > the drivers, because it's all the same for them. ... > there is that
struct ifnet is embedded in the softc. ... so a pointer to an ifnet or softc
or whatever is almost always ... (freebsd-arch) - Re: kldunload DIAGNOSTIC idea...
... > the drivers, because it's all the same for them. ... > there is that
struct ifnet is embedded in the softc. ... so a pointer to an ifnet or softc
or whatever is almost always ... (freebsd-arch) - Re: kldunload DIAGNOSTIC idea...
... >drain out before we unload the module. ... >but it seems that the requirements
for softc are stronger than ifnet ... >wait for the ifnet reference count to
drop before returning for ... so that it isn't actually in the driver). ... (freebsd-arch)